From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM selftests for s390x References: <20190516111253.4494-1-thuth@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 13:20:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190516111253.4494-1-thuth@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Thomas Huth , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Shuah Khan , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Andrew Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 16/05/19 13:12, Thomas Huth wrote: > This patch series enables the KVM selftests for s390x. As a first > test, the sync_regs from x86 has been adapted to s390x. > > Please note that the ucall() interface is not used yet - since > s390x neither has PIO nor MMIO, this needs some more work first > before it becomes usable (we likely should use a DIAG hypercall > here, which is what the sync_reg test is currently using, too...). No objections at all, though it would be like to have ucall plumbed in from the beginning. Paolo