From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests RFC 1/2] s390x: Add guest snippet support
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 12:10:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5171773-afb6-e148-a82f-ea78877206ce@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210520094730.55759-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
On 20/05/2021 11.47, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Snippets can be used to easily write and run guest (SIE) tests.
> The snippet is linked into the test binaries and can therefore be
> accessed via a ptr.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> .gitignore | 2 ++
> s390x/Makefile | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---
> s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S | 13 ++++++++++
> s390x/snippets/c/flat.lds | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S
> create mode 100644 s390x/snippets/c/flat.lds
>
> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
> index 784cb2dd..29d3635b 100644
> --- a/.gitignore
> +++ b/.gitignore
> @@ -22,3 +22,5 @@ cscope.*
> /api/dirty-log
> /api/dirty-log-perf
> /s390x/*.bin
> +/s390x/snippets/*/*.bin
> +/s390x/snippets/*/*.gbin
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> index 8de926ab..fe267011 100644
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -75,11 +75,33 @@ OBJDIRS += lib/s390x
> asmlib = $(TEST_DIR)/cstart64.o $(TEST_DIR)/cpu.o
>
> FLATLIBS = $(libcflat)
> -%.elf: %.o $(FLATLIBS) $(SRCDIR)/s390x/flat.lds $(asmlib)
> +
> +SNIPPET_DIR = $(TEST_DIR)/snippets
> +
> +# C snippets that need to be linked
> +snippets-c =
> +
> +# ASM snippets that are directly compiled and converted to a *.gbin
> +snippets-a =
Could you please call this snippets-s instead of ...-a ? The -a suffix looks
like an archive to me otherwise.
> +snippets = $(snippets-a)$(snippets-c)
Shouldn't there be a space between the two?
> +snippets-o += $(patsubst %.gbin,%.o,$(snippets))
> +
> +$(snippets-a): $(snippets-o) $(FLATLIBS)
> + $(OBJCOPY) -O binary $(patsubst %.gbin,%.o,$@) $@
> + $(OBJCOPY) -I binary -O elf64-s390 -B "s390:64-bit" $@ $@
> +
> +$(snippets-c): $(snippets-o) $(SNIPPET_DIR)/c/cstart.o $(FLATLIBS)
> + $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ -T $(SNIPPET_DIR)/c/flat.lds \
> + $(filter %.o, $^) $(FLATLIBS)
> + $(OBJCOPY) -O binary $@ $@
> + $(OBJCOPY) -I binary -O elf64-s390 -B "s390:64-bit" $@ $@
> +
> +%.elf: $(snippets) %.o $(FLATLIBS) $(SRCDIR)/s390x/flat.lds $(asmlib)
> $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $(@:.elf=.aux.o) \
> $(SRCDIR)/lib/auxinfo.c -DPROGNAME=\"$@\"
> $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ -T $(SRCDIR)/s390x/flat.lds \
> - $(filter %.o, $^) $(FLATLIBS) $(@:.elf=.aux.o)
> + $(filter %.o, $^) $(FLATLIBS) $(snippets) $(@:.elf=.aux.o)
Does this link the snippets into all elf files? ... wouldn't it be better to
restrict it somehow to the files that really need them?
> $(RM) $(@:.elf=.aux.o)
> @chmod a-x $@
>
> @@ -93,7 +115,7 @@ FLATLIBS = $(libcflat)
> $(GENPROTIMG) --host-key-document $(HOST_KEY_DOCUMENT) --no-verify --image $< -o $@
>
> arch_clean: asm_offsets_clean
> - $(RM) $(TEST_DIR)/*.{o,elf,bin} $(TEST_DIR)/.*.d lib/s390x/.*.d
> + $(RM) $(TEST_DIR)/*.{o,elf,bin} $(SNIPPET_DIR)/c/*.{o,elf,bin,gbin} $(SNIPPET_DIR)/.*.d $(TEST_DIR)/.*.d lib/s390x/.*.d
>
> generated-files = $(asm-offsets)
> $(tests:.elf=.o) $(asmlib) $(cflatobjs): $(generated-files)
> diff --git a/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S b/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..02a3338b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +#include <asm/sigp.h>
> +
> +.section .init
> + .globl start
> +start:
> + /* XOR all registers with themselves to clear them fully. */
> + .irp i, 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
> + xgr \i,\i
> + .endr
> + /* 0x3000 is the stack page for now */
> + lghi %r15, 0x4000
> + brasl %r14, main
> + sigp %r1, %r0, SIGP_STOP
I think you should clear r0 before using it here?
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-21 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 9:47 [kvm-unit-tests RFC 0/2] s390x: Add snippet support Janosch Frank
2021-05-20 9:47 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 1/2] s390x: Add guest " Janosch Frank
2021-05-25 16:44 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-26 10:12 ` Janosch Frank
2021-06-21 10:10 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2021-06-21 12:19 ` Janosch Frank
2021-06-21 12:32 ` Thomas Huth
2021-06-21 12:39 ` Janosch Frank
2021-06-21 13:28 ` Thomas Huth
2021-06-21 14:42 ` Janosch Frank
2021-06-21 14:59 ` Thomas Huth
2021-05-20 9:47 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 2/2] s390x: mvpg: Add SIE mvpg test Janosch Frank
2021-05-25 17:37 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-26 10:17 ` Janosch Frank
2021-05-27 14:35 ` Janosch Frank
2021-06-21 10:23 ` Thomas Huth
2021-06-21 12:41 ` Janosch Frank
2021-05-20 13:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 0/2] s390x: Add snippet support David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b5171773-afb6-e148-a82f-ea78877206ce@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).