From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: KVM: s390: Move two error code assignments in kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log() Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:31:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: <70f41e59-d8a4-de42-6064-80ecf6acc065@users.sourceforge.net> <35411200-2bd6-1c65-7d7f-21a6353875ea@de.ibm.com> <01d581bb-9db6-cba1-e476-49c814c3ebf0@users.sourceforge.net> <50ae2ba4-572d-8524-fc31-acc1a8d1ad99@de.ibm.com> <75c6315c-8947-2816-64da-947f6a29ac57@users.sourceforge.net> <64b94d75-6bad-1ebc-c35e-c036202bab01@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <64b94d75-6bad-1ebc-c35e-c036202bab01@redhat.com> Sender: kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_Borntr=c3=a4ger?= , Cornelia Huck , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > It's just not possible to discuss things with you. I wonder about your conclusion. We have got just different software development opinions on some details. I assume that a few additional dialogue techniques could help a bit more in our communication difficulties. > If other people want to merge your patches to KVM, they are free to do so. I am curious if other update suggestions will be picked up in a constructive way. Regards, Markus