From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605F2C43219 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242234AbiAYPAd (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:00:33 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:17612 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1389531AbiAYOzF (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:55:05 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 20PEjuGh031767; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:54:57 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=Zw/loyjbTJxxS1KmfvpvDiOMIK7PqnEtAuLCUVE1xtU=; b=G2JeIe/LF2cpEiLor6snigKTnwaQKwx1+xbYwinhT2fAjy70G+BwzAVHLrH7RVqHF5sq hZw61qnmNtrtxoEGwtu/r0Uo+Olgoa3PLUqvBuG47Jc+zVDsg240khTFdAr4Hf0+7hNl r8whSFh76h10sg2U/nptOpWqnIU5zcc6BRW3UPO+xy5ExUzECDUc6TAvW/op4zy8YJe1 6wYFFLp39+H48KrH+MdOdWkf97HlCb7E4Vb3UQFoj6AiO/h0EfNy6cZkLlPbjkxT2urc /iya1LoBxP1my9iEd7IRESpntEP7C3Nm72YnvdQ7t0+YKuziWYf6ZAvQM6+L3m0IvVim JA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3dtjrt8u7t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:54:57 +0000 Received: from m0098413.ppops.net (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 20PEnJiQ008561; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:54:56 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3dtjrt8u7c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:54:56 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 20PEmKfm028083; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:54:55 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3dr96jf9x2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:54:54 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 20PEsqtW35258672 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:54:52 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D7842045; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:54:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2194204B; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:54:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-ca45c2cc-336f-11b2-a85c-c6e71de567f1.ibm.com (unknown [9.171.17.160]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:54:52 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu] s390x: sck: load into a temporary not into in1 From: Nico Boehr To: David Hildenbrand , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: richard.henderson@linaro.org, thuth@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:54:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <9a888391-1020-89b0-65ed-5c93f2cc8642@redhat.com> References: <20220125122914.567599-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com> <9a888391-1020-89b0-65ed-5c93f2cc8642@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.3 (3.42.3-1.fc35) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: j2mzPcFZN9am7iyrCWArefBvGfbUP5Gq X-Proofpoint-GUID: FevJGd15Wo6BZrRBkyPBBot0I4tDtrOo X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-01-25_02,2022-01-25_01,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=917 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2201250094 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 14:13 +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > I think you can actually just reuse in2_m2_64a, similar as we handle > SCKC I tried my SCK tests with your patch, it works just as well and seems much cleaner, thanks. Do you want to send this or should I make a v2 and add you as Suggested-by?