From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Morel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] KVM: s390: vsie: Do the CRYCB validation first Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:42:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1535019956-23539-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <1535019956-23539-3-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> Reply-To: pmorel@linux.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: David Hildenbrand , Christian Borntraeger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com List-ID: On 23/08/2018 13:19, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 23.08.2018 13:17, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >> >> On 08/23/2018 12:25 PM, Pierre Morel wrote: >>> When entering the SIE the CRYCB validation better >>> be done independently of the instruction's >>> availability. >> >> Maybe something like >> >> We need to handle the validity checks for the crycb, no matter what the >> settings for the keywrappings are. So lets move the keywrapping checks >> after we have done the validy checks. >> >> ? > > With that > > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand > > Thanks, I use the description proposed by Christian. regards, Pierre -- Pierre Morel Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany