From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 11/11] KVM: s390: Add VSIE shadow stat counters
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 12:07:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9264abb-4bcc-498b-adf9-1167d519b254@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110-vsieie-v2-11-9e53a3618c8c@linux.ibm.com>
On 11/10/25 18:16, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> Add new stat counters to VSIE shadowing to be able to verify and monitor
> the functionality.
>
> * vsie_shadow_scb shows the number of allocated SIE control block
> shadows. Should count upwards between 0 and the max number of cpus.
> * vsie_shadow_sca shows the number of allocated system control area
> shadows. Should count upwards between 0 and the max number of cpus.
> * vsie_shadow_sca_create shows the number of newly allocated system
> control area shadows.
> * vsie_shadow_sca_reuse shows the number of reused system control area
> shadows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++++
> arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 191b23edf0ac7e9a3e1fd9cdc6fc4c9a9e6769f8..ef7bf2d357f8d289b5f163ec95976c5d270d1380 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -457,6 +457,10 @@ struct kvm_vm_stat {
> u64 gmap_shadow_r3_entry;
> u64 gmap_shadow_sg_entry;
> u64 gmap_shadow_pg_entry;
> + u64 vsie_shadow_scb;
> + u64 vsie_shadow_sca;
> + u64 vsie_shadow_sca_create;
> + u64 vsie_shadow_sca_reuse;
> };
>
> struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index e3fc53e33e90be7dab75f73ebd0b949c13d22939..d86bf2206c230ce25fd48610c8305326e260e590 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ const struct _kvm_stats_desc kvm_vm_stats_desc[] = {
> STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, gmap_shadow_r3_entry),
> STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, gmap_shadow_sg_entry),
> STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, gmap_shadow_pg_entry),
> + STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, vsie_shadow_scb),
> + STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, vsie_shadow_sca),
> + STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, vsie_shadow_sca_create),
> + STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, vsie_shadow_sca_reuse),
> };
>
> const struct kvm_stats_header kvm_vm_stats_header = {
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> index cd114df5e119bd289d14037d1f1c5bfe148cf5c7..f7c1a217173cefe93d0914623df08efa14270771 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> @@ -767,6 +767,8 @@ static int shadow_scb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
> out:
> if (rc)
> unshadow_scb(vcpu, vsie_page);
> + else
> + vcpu->kvm->stat.vsie_shadow_scb++;
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -843,8 +845,10 @@ static struct vsie_sca *get_existing_vsie_sca(struct kvm *kvm, hpa_t sca_o_gpa)
> {
> struct vsie_sca *sca = radix_tree_lookup(&kvm->arch.vsie.osca_to_sca, sca_o_gpa);
>
> - if (sca)
> + if (sca) {
> WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_inc_return(&sca->ref_count) < 1);
> + kvm->stat.vsie_shadow_sca_reuse++;
> + }
> return sca;
> }
>
> @@ -958,6 +962,8 @@ static struct vsie_sca *get_vsie_sca(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vs
> sca_new = NULL;
>
> kvm->arch.vsie.scas[kvm->arch.vsie.sca_count] = sca;
> + kvm->arch.vsie.sca_count++;
Why are you touching a non-stat variable in this patch?
> + kvm->stat.vsie_shadow_sca++;
> } else {
> /* reuse previously created vsie_sca allocation for different osca */
> sca = get_free_existing_vsie_sca(kvm);
> @@ -992,6 +998,7 @@ static struct vsie_sca *get_vsie_sca(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vs
>
> atomic_set(&sca->ref_count, 1);
> radix_tree_insert(&kvm->arch.vsie.osca_to_sca, sca->sca_gpa, sca);
> + kvm->stat.vsie_shadow_sca_create++;
>
> out:
> up_write(&kvm->arch.vsie.ssca_lock);
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 17:16 [PATCH RFC v2 00/11] KVM: s390: Add VSIE SIGP Interpretation (vsie_sigpif) Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-10 17:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/11] KVM: s390: Add SCAO read and write helpers Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-11 13:45 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2025-11-11 14:37 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-11 14:55 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2025-11-10 17:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/11] KVM: s390: Remove double 64bscao feature check Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-10 21:32 ` Eric Farman
2025-11-11 8:13 ` Hendrik Brueckner
2025-11-11 13:20 ` Janosch Frank
2025-11-10 17:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/11] KVM: s390: Move scao validation into a function Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-10 21:30 ` Eric Farman
2025-11-11 8:48 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-10 17:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/11] KVM: s390: Add vsie_sigpif detection Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-10 17:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/11] KVM: s390: Add ssca_block and ssca_entry structs for vsie_ie Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-10 17:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/11] KVM: s390: Add helper to pin multiple guest pages Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-13 15:24 ` Janosch Frank
2025-11-10 17:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/11] KVM: s390: Shadow VSIE SCA in guest-1 Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-14 14:09 ` Janosch Frank
2025-11-17 15:39 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-17 15:22 ` Janosch Frank
2025-11-18 9:27 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-18 16:04 ` Janosch Frank
2025-11-21 15:10 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-20 11:15 ` Janosch Frank
2025-11-10 17:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/11] KVM: s390: Allow guest-3 cpu add and remove with vsie sigpif Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-11 15:47 ` Janosch Frank
2025-11-11 16:34 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-10 17:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/11] KVM: s390: Allow guest-3 switch to extended sca " Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-11 14:18 ` Janosch Frank
2025-11-10 17:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/11] KVM: s390: Add VSIE shadow configuration Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-20 11:02 ` Janosch Frank
2025-11-10 17:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/11] KVM: s390: Add VSIE shadow stat counters Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-20 11:07 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c9264abb-4bcc-498b-adf9-1167d519b254@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).