Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 6/6] s390x: SCLP unit test

Thomas Huth
2020-01-22T12:13:22Z

On 22/01/2020 12.20, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 22.01.20 11:40, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 22.01.20 11:39, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 22/01/2020 11.32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> On 22.01.20 11:31, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>>> On 22/01/2020 11.22, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>>> On 22.01.20 11:10, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>>>> On 20.01.20 19:42, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
>>>>>>>> SCLP unit test. Testing the following:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Correctly ignoring instruction bits that should be ignored
>>>>>>>> * Privileged instruction check
>>>>>>>> * Check for addressing exceptions
>>>>>>>> * Specification exceptions:
>>>>>>>> - SCCB size less than 8
>>>>>>>> - SCCB unaligned
>>>>>>>> - SCCB overlaps prefix or lowcore
>>>>>>>> - SCCB address higher than 2GB
>>>>>>>> * Return codes for
>>>>>>>> - Invalid command
>>>>>>>> - SCCB too short (but at least 8)
>>>>>>>> - SCCB page boundary violation
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> s390x/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>>>>> s390x/sclp.c | 474 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> s390x/unittests.cfg | 8 +
>>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 483 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>> create mode 100644 s390x/sclp.c
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
>>>>>>>> index 3744372..ddb4b48 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/s390x/Makefile
>>>>>>>> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
>>>>>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/diag288.elf
>>>>>>>> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/stsi.elf
>>>>>>>> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/skrf.elf
>>>>>>>> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/smp.elf
>>>>>>>> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/sclp.elf
>>>>>>>> tests_binary = $(patsubst %.elf,%.bin,$(tests))
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> all: directories test_cases test_cases_binary
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/s390x/sclp.c b/s390x/sclp.c
>>>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>>>> index 0000000..215347e
>>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>>>> +++ b/s390x/sclp.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,474 @@
>>>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>>>> + * Service Call tests
>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2019 IBM Corp
>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>> + * Authors:
>>>>>>>> + * Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>> + * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>>>>>>>> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2.
>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +#include <libcflat.h>
>>>>>>>> +#include <asm/page.h>
>>>>>>>> +#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>>>>>>>> +#include <asm/interrupt.h>
>>>>>>>> +#include <sclp.h>
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +#define PGM_NONE 1
>>>>>>>> +#define PGM_BIT_SPEC (1ULL << PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION)
>>>>>>>> +#define PGM_BIT_ADDR (1ULL << PGM_INT_CODE_ADDRESSING)
>>>>>>>> +#define PGM_BIT_PRIV (1ULL << PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION)
>>>>>>>> +#define MKPTR(x) ((void *)(uint64_t)(x))
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +#define LC_SIZE (2 * PAGE_SIZE)
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +static uint8_t pagebuf[LC_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(LC_SIZE))); /* scratch pages used for some tests */
>>>>>>>> +static uint8_t prefix_buf[LC_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(LC_SIZE))); /* temporary lowcore for test_sccb_prefix */
>>>>>>>> +static uint8_t sccb_template[PAGE_SIZE]; /* SCCB template to be used */
>>>>>>>> +static uint32_t valid_code; /* valid command code for READ SCP INFO */
>>>>>>>> +static struct lowcore *lc;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>>>> + * Perform one service call, handling exceptions and interrupts.
>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>> +static int sclp_service_call_test(unsigned int command, void *sccb)
>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>> + int cc;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + sclp_mark_busy();
>>>>>>>> + sclp_setup_int();
>>>>>>>> + cc = servc(command, __pa(sccb));
>>>>>>>> + if (lc->pgm_int_code) {
>>>>>>>> + sclp_handle_ext();
>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> + if (!cc)
>>>>>>>> + sclp_wait_busy();
>>>>>>>> + return cc;
>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>>>> + * Perform one test at the given address, optionally using the SCCB template,
>>>>>>>> + * checking for the expected program interrupts and return codes.
>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>> + * The parameter buf_len indicates the number of bytes of the template that
>>>>>>>> + * should be copied to the test address, and should be 0 when the test
>>>>>>>> + * address is invalid, in which case nothing is copied.
>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>> + * The template is used to simplify tests where the same buffer content is
>>>>>>>> + * used many times in a row, at different addresses.
>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>> + * Returns true in case of success or false in case of failure
>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>> +static bool test_one_sccb(uint32_t cmd, uint8_t *addr, uint16_t buf_len, uint64_t exp_pgm, uint16_t exp_rc)
>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>> + SCCBHeader *h = (SCCBHeader *)addr;
>>>>>>>> + int res, pgm;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + /* Copy the template to the test address if needed */
>>>>>>>> + if (buf_len)
>>>>>>>> + memcpy(addr, sccb_template, buf_len);
>>>>>>>> + if (exp_pgm != PGM_NONE)
>>>>>>>> + expect_pgm_int();
>>>>>>>> + /* perform the actual call */
>>>>>>>> + res = sclp_service_call_test(cmd, h);
>>>>>>>> + if (res) {
>>>>>>>> + report_info("SCLP not ready (command %#x, address %p, cc %d)", cmd, addr, res);
>>>>>>>> + return false;
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> + pgm = clear_pgm_int();
>>>>>>>> + /* Check if the program exception was one of the expected ones */
>>>>>>>> + if (!((1ULL << pgm) & exp_pgm)) {
>>>>>>>> + report_info("First failure at addr %p, buf_len %d, cmd %#x, pgm code %d",
>>>>>>>> + addr, buf_len, cmd, pgm);
>>>>>>>> + return false;
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> + /* Check if the response code is the one expected */
>>>>>>>> + if (exp_rc && exp_rc != h->response_code) {
>>>>>>>> + report_info("First failure at addr %p, buf_len %d, cmd %#x, resp code %#x",
>>>>>>>> + addr, buf_len, cmd, h->response_code);
>>>>>>>> + return false;
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> + return true;
>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>>>> + * Wrapper for test_one_sccb to be used when the template should not be
>>>>>>>> + * copied and the memory address should not be touched.
>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>> +static bool test_one_ro(uint32_t cmd, uint8_t *addr, uint64_t exp_pgm, uint16_t exp_rc)
>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>> + return test_one_sccb(cmd, addr, 0, exp_pgm, exp_rc);
>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>>>> + * Wrapper for test_one_sccb to set up a simple SCCB template.
>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>> + * The parameter sccb_len indicates the value that will be saved in the SCCB
>>>>>>>> + * length field of the SCCB, buf_len indicates the number of bytes of
>>>>>>>> + * template that need to be copied to the actual test address. In many cases
>>>>>>>> + * it's enough to clear/copy the first 8 bytes of the buffer, while the SCCB
>>>>>>>> + * itself can be larger.
>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>> + * Returns true in case of success or false in case of failure
>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>> +static bool test_one_simple(uint32_t cmd, uint8_t *addr, uint16_t sccb_len,
>>>>>>>> + uint16_t buf_len, uint64_t exp_pgm, uint16_t exp_rc)
>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>> + memset(sccb_template, 0, sizeof(sccb_template));
>>>>>>>> + ((SCCBHeader *)sccb_template)->length = sccb_len;
>>>>>>>> + return test_one_sccb(cmd, addr, buf_len, exp_pgm, exp_rc);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Doing a fresh ./configure + make on RHEL7 gives me
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [linux1@rhkvm01 kvm-unit-tests]$ make
>>>>>>> gcc -std=gnu99 -ffreestanding -I /home/linux1/git/kvm-unit-tests/lib -I /home/linux1/git/kvm-unit-tests/lib/s390x -I lib -O2 -march=zEC12 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -g -MMD -MF s390x/.sclp.d -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wempty-body -Wuninitialized -Wignored-qualifiers -Werror -fomit-frame-pointer -Wno-frame-address -fno-pic -Wclobbered -Wunused-but-set-parameter -Wmissing-parameter-type -Wold-style-declaration -Woverride-init -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -c -o s390x/sclp.o s390x/sclp.c
>>>>>>> s390x/sclp.c: In function 'test_one_simple':
>>>>>>> s390x/sclp.c:121:2: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Werror=strict-aliasing]
>>>>>>> ((SCCBHeader *)sccb_template)->length = sccb_len;
>>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>> s390x/sclp.c: At top level:
>>>>>>> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-frame-address" [-Werror]
>>>>>>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>>>>>>> make: *** [s390x/sclp.o] Error 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The following makes it work:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/s390x/sclp.c b/s390x/sclp.c
>>>>>> index c13fa60..0b8117a 100644
>>>>>> --- a/s390x/sclp.c
>>>>>> +++ b/s390x/sclp.c
>>>>>> @@ -117,8 +117,10 @@ static bool test_one_ro(uint32_t cmd, uint8_t *addr, uint64_t exp_pgm, uint16_t
>>>>>> static bool test_one_simple(uint32_t cmd, uint8_t *addr, uint16_t sccb_len,
>>>>>> uint16_t buf_len, uint64_t exp_pgm, uint16_t exp_rc)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> + SCCBHeader *header = (void *)sccb_template;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> memset(sccb_template, 0, sizeof(sccb_template));
>>>>>> - ((SCCBHeader *)sccb_template)->length = sccb_len;
>>>>>> + header->length = sccb_len;
>>>>>
>>>>> While that might silence the compiler warning, we still might get
>>>>> aliasing problems here, I think.
>>>>> The right way to solve this problem is to turn sccb_template into a
>>>>> union of the various structs/arrays that you want to use and then access
>>>>> the fields through the union instead ("type-punning through union").
>>>>
>>>> We do have the exact same thing in lib/s390x/sclp.c already, no?
>>>
>>> Maybe we should carefully check that code, too...
>>>
>>>> Especially, new compilers don't seem to care?
>>>
>>> I've seen horrible bugs due to these aliasing problems in the past -
>>> without compiler warnings showing up! Certain versions of GCC assume
>>> that they can re-order code with pointers that point to types of
>>> different sizes, i.e. in the above example, I think they could assume
>>> that they could re-order the memset() and the header->length = ... line.
>>> I'd feel better if we play safe and use a union here.
>>
>> Should we simply allow type-punning?
>
> For now I squashed
>
> diff --git a/s390x/sclp.c b/s390x/sclp.c
> index c13fa60..7d92bf3 100644
> --- a/s390x/sclp.c
> +++ b/s390x/sclp.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,12 @@
>
> static uint8_t pagebuf[LC_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(LC_SIZE))); /*
> scratch pages used for some tests */
> static uint8_t prefix_buf[LC_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(LC_SIZE)));
> /* temporary lowcore for test_sccb_prefix */
> -static uint8_t sccb_template[PAGE_SIZE]; /* SCCB template to be used */
> +/* SCCB template to be used */
> +static union {
> + uint8_t raw[PAGE_SIZE];
> + SCCBHeader header;
> + WriteEventData data;
> +} sccb_template;
> static uint32_t valid_code; /* valid command code for READ SCP INFO */
> static struct lowcore *lc;
>
> @@ -69,7 +74,7 @@ static bool test_one_sccb(uint32_t cmd, uint8_t *addr,
> uint16_t buf_len, uint64_
>
> /* Copy the template to the test address if needed */
> if (buf_len)
> - memcpy(addr, sccb_template, buf_len);
> + memcpy(addr, sccb_template.raw, buf_len);
> if (exp_pgm != PGM_NONE)
> expect_pgm_int();
> /* perform the actual call */
> @@ -117,8 +122,8 @@ static bool test_one_ro(uint32_t cmd, uint8_t *addr,
> uint64_t exp_pgm, uint16_t
> static bool test_one_simple(uint32_t cmd, uint8_t *addr, uint16_t sccb_len,
> uint16_t buf_len, uint64_t exp_pgm, uint16_t exp_rc)
> {
> - memset(sccb_template, 0, sizeof(sccb_template));
> - ((SCCBHeader *)sccb_template)->length = sccb_len;
> + memset(sccb_template.raw, 0, sizeof(sccb_template.raw));
> + sccb_template.header.length = sccb_len;
> return test_one_sccb(cmd, addr, buf_len, exp_pgm, exp_rc);
> }
>
> @@ -299,10 +304,10 @@ static void test_boundary(void)
> {
> const uint32_t cmd = SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_DATA;
> const uint16_t res = SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION;
> - WriteEventData *sccb = (WriteEventData *)sccb_template;
> + WriteEventData *sccb = &sccb_template.data;
> int len, offset;
>
> - memset(sccb_template, 0, sizeof(sccb_template));
> + memset(sccb_template.raw, 0, sizeof(sccb_template.raw));
> sccb->h.function_code = SCLP_FC_NORMAL_WRITE;
> for (len = 32; len <= 4096; len++) {
> offset = len & 7 ? len & ~7 : len - 8;
> @@ -323,10 +328,10 @@ static void test_toolong(void)
> {
> const uint32_t cmd = SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_DATA;
> const uint16_t res = SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION;
> - WriteEventData *sccb = (WriteEventData *)sccb_template;
> + WriteEventData *sccb = &sccb_template.data;
> int len;
>
> - memset(sccb_template, 0, sizeof(sccb_template));
> + memset(sccb_template.raw, 0, sizeof(sccb_template.raw));
> sccb->h.function_code = SCLP_FC_NORMAL_WRITE;
> for (len = 4097; len < 8192; len++) {
> sccb->h.length = len;

Thanks, that looks better now!

Thomas