From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
dominik.dingel@gmail.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 19/22] s390/mm: Split huge pages if granular protection is needed
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:16:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d886d2af-925b-47ef-300d-99ba9f088df7@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513169613-13509-20-git-send-email-frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3165 bytes --]
On 13.12.2017 13:53, Janosch Frank wrote:
> A guest can put DAT tables for a lower level guest in the same huge
> segment as one of its prefixes or a g3 page. This would make it
> necessary for the segment to be unprotected (because of the prefix)
> and protected (because of the shadowing) at the same time. This is not
> possible in this universe.
>
> Hence we split the affected huge segment, so we can protect on a
> per-page basis. Such gmap segments are special and get a new software
> bit, that helps us handling this edge case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/gmap.h | 13 ++
> arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h | 7 +-
> arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 10 +-
> arch/s390/mm/gmap.c | 256 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c | 51 ++++++++
> 5 files changed, 313 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> @@ -1081,20 +1189,27 @@ static int gmap_protect_range(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr,
> spinlock_t *ptl;
> unsigned long vmaddr, dist;
> pmd_t *pmdp, *hpmdp;
> - int rc;
> + int rc = 0;
>
> while (len) {
> rc = -EAGAIN;
> vmaddr = __gmap_translate(gmap, gaddr);
> hpmdp = (pmd_t *)huge_pte_offset(gmap->mm, vmaddr, HPAGE_SIZE);
> + if (!hpmdp)
> + BUG();
> /* Do we need tests here? */
> ptl = pmd_lock(gmap->mm, hpmdp);
>
> pmdp = gmap_pmd_op_walk(gmap, gaddr);
> if (pmdp) {
> if (!pmd_large(*pmdp)) {
> - rc = gmap_protect_pte(gmap, gaddr, pmdp, prot,
> - bits);
> + if (gmap_pmd_is_split(pmdp) &&
> + (bits & GMAP_NOTIFY_MPROT)) {
> + pmd_val(*pmdp) |= _SEGMENT_ENTRY_GMAP_IN;
> + }
@David:
This currently breaks my brain. There *was* a reason why I put this
there and I was quite insistent that we needed it. Something about
notification areas on splits, but I absolutely can't remember it. Sigh,
should've made a comment.
This might be a leftover from earlier versions, but could also keep us
from doing mprot notification on pte's.
> +
> + rc = gmap_protect_pte(gmap, gaddr, vmaddr,
> + pmdp, hpmdp, prot, bits);
> if (!rc) {
> len -= PAGE_SIZE;
> gaddr += PAGE_SIZE;
> @@ -1111,7 +1226,9 @@ static int gmap_protect_range(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr,
[...]
> @@ -2774,6 +2977,8 @@ void gmap_pmdp_idte_global(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vmaddr)
> IDTE_GLOBAL);
> else
> __pmdp_csp(pmdp);
> +
> + gmap_pmd_split_free(pmdp);
> *entry = _SEGMENT_ENTRY_EMPTY;
> }
> spin_unlock(&gmap->guest_table_lock);
> @@ -2852,6 +3057,7 @@ void gmap_sync_dirty_log_pmd(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long bitmap[4],
> pmd_t *pmdp, *hpmdp;
> spinlock_t *ptl;
>
> + /* Protection against gmap_link vsie unprotection. */
> hpmdp = (pmd_t *)huge_pte_offset(gmap->mm, vmaddr, HPAGE_SIZE);
> if (!hpmdp)
> return;
> @@ -2867,9 +3073,17 @@ void gmap_sync_dirty_log_pmd(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long bitmap[4],
> gaddr, vmaddr))
> memset(bitmap, 0xFF, 32);
s/0xFF/0xff/
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-25 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-13 12:53 [RFC/PATCH v2 00/22] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 01/22] s390/mm: make gmap_protect_range more modular Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 11:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 12:31 ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 12:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 13:02 ` Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 02/22] s390/mm: Abstract gmap notify bit setting Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 11:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 03/22] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification Janosch Frank
2017-12-21 9:24 ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 11:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 13:13 ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 13:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 14:04 ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 11:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 12:09 ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 12:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 04/22] s390/mm: Add gmap pmd invalidation and clearing Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 05/22] s390/mm: hugetlb pages within a gmap can not be freed Janosch Frank
2018-01-24 13:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-24 13:56 ` Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 06/22] s390/mm: Introduce gmap_pmdp_xchg Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 07/22] RFC: s390/mm: Transfer guest pmd protection to host Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 08/22] s390/mm: Add huge page dirty sync support Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 09/22] s390/mm: clear huge page storage keys on enable_skey Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 10/22] s390/mm: Add huge pmd storage key handling Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 11/22] s390/mm: Remove superfluous parameter Janosch Frank
2017-12-21 9:22 ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-16 12:39 ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-16 13:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 13:14 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-22 13:24 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 12/22] s390/mm: Add gmap_protect_large read protection support Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 13/22] s390/mm: Make gmap_read_table EDAT1 compatible Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 14/22] s390/mm: Make protect_rmap " Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 15/22] s390/mm: GMAP read table extensions Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 16/22] s390/mm: Add shadow segment code Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 17/22] s390/mm: Add VSIE reverse fake case Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 18/22] s390/mm: Remove gmap_pte_op_walk Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 19/22] s390/mm: Split huge pages if granular protection is needed Janosch Frank
2018-01-25 7:16 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2018-01-25 14:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-25 14:55 ` Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 20/22] s390/mm: Enable gmap huge pmd support Janosch Frank
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 21/22] KVM: s390: Add KVM HPAGE capability Janosch Frank
2017-12-20 13:02 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-12-20 13:17 ` Janosch Frank
2017-12-20 13:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-12-13 12:53 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 22/22] RFC: s390/mm: Add gmap lock classes Janosch Frank
2017-12-20 12:24 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-12-20 12:36 ` Janosch Frank
2017-12-20 12:23 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 00/22] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement Christian Borntraeger
2017-12-21 12:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-12-22 9:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-02 0:02 ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-22 11:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-22 11:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-23 21:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-24 9:01 ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-24 9:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-25 15:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] Huge page pte protection Janosch Frank
2018-01-25 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: s390: Only notify on 4k pages Janosch Frank
2018-01-25 16:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-26 10:31 ` Janosch Frank
2018-01-25 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: s390: Rename gmap_pte_op_fixup Janosch Frank
2018-01-26 10:34 ` [PATCH v2] mm: s390: Only notify on 4k pages Janosch Frank
2018-01-30 10:19 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d886d2af-925b-47ef-300d-99ba9f088df7@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dominik.dingel@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).