linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	akrowiak@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: s390: vsie: Make use of CRYCB FORMAT2 clear
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:47:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e0b80820-b4cd-5f51-bd57-ea6e2e638a40@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58427761-072c-e420-a881-4decbe9088bb@linux.ibm.com>

On 23/08/2018 13:33, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 8/23/18 1:21 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 23.08.2018 13:05, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> On 8/23/18 12:25 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>>> The comment preceding the shadow_crycb function is
>>>> misleading, we effectively accept FORMAT2 CRYCB in the
>>>> guest.
>>>
>>> I beg to differ:
>>>
>>> if (!(crycbd_o & vcpu->arch.sie_block->crycbd & CRYCB_FORMAT1))
>>> 		return 0;
>>
>> FORMAT2 includes bit FORMAT1 (backwards compatible)
> 
> Right, this check is very misleading because of the constant, we
> effectively test against Format 0 and Format 2.
> 
> Can we make this clearer by explicitly ANDing 0x01 or adding a comment?

yes, done, I modified the comment in front of the function.

> 
> Code makes sense:
> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks,

regards,
Pierre

> 
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> When using FORMAT2 in the host we do not need to or with
>>>> FORMAT1.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 6 +++---
>>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
>>>> index 38ea5da..e0e6fbf 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
>>>> @@ -140,7 +140,8 @@ static int prepare_cpuflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
>>>>    * Create a shadow copy of the crycb block and setup key wrapping, if
>>>>    * requested for guest 3 and enabled for guest 2.
>>>>    *
>>>> - * We only accept format-1 (no AP in g2), but convert it into format-2
>>>> + * We accept format-1 or format-2, but we treat it as a format-1 (no AP in g2),
>>>> + * and we convert it into format-2 in the shadow CRYCB.
>>>>    * There is nothing to do for format-0.
>>>>    *
>>>>    * Returns: - 0 if shadowed or nothing to do
>>>> @@ -179,8 +180,7 @@ static int shadow_crycb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
>>>>   		return set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x0035U);
>>>>   
>>>>   	scb_s->ecb3 |= ecb3_flags;
>>>> -	scb_s->crycbd = ((__u32)(__u64) &vsie_page->crycb) | CRYCB_FORMAT1 |
>>>> -			CRYCB_FORMAT2;
>>>> +	scb_s->crycbd = ((__u32)(__u64) &vsie_page->crycb) | CRYCB_FORMAT2;
>>>
>>> That's purely cosmetic but valid.
>>>
>>>>   
>>>>   	/* xor both blocks in one run */
>>>>   	b1 = (unsigned long *) vsie_page->crycb.dea_wrapping_key_mask;
>>
>> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-23 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-23 10:25 [PATCH v3 0/3] KVM: s390: vsie: Consolidate CRYCB validation Pierre Morel
2018-08-23 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: s390: vsie: copy wrapping keys to right place Pierre Morel
2018-08-23 11:07   ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-08-23 11:19     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-23 11:41       ` Pierre Morel
2018-08-23 12:43         ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-08-23 12:48           ` Pierre Morel
2018-08-23 13:12   ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-08-23 13:13     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-23 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] KVM: s390: vsie: Do the CRYCB validation first Pierre Morel
2018-08-23 11:17   ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-08-23 11:19     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-23 11:42       ` Pierre Morel
2018-08-23 11:39     ` Pierre Morel
2018-08-23 13:43   ` Janosch Frank
2018-08-23 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: s390: vsie: Make use of CRYCB FORMAT2 clear Pierre Morel
2018-08-23 11:05   ` Janosch Frank
2018-08-23 11:21     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-23 11:33       ` Janosch Frank
2018-08-23 11:47         ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2018-08-23 11:53           ` Janosch Frank
2018-08-23 12:03             ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-23 12:11               ` Janosch Frank
2018-08-23 11:40       ` Pierre Morel
2018-08-23 13:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] KVM: s390: vsie: Consolidate CRYCB validation Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e0b80820-b4cd-5f51-bd57-ea6e2e638a40@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).