From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 09/11] x86/tsc: prepare for early sched_clock References: <20180621212518.19914-1-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> <20180621212518.19914-10-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> From: Boris Ostrovsky Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 19:16:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Thomas Gleixner , Pavel Tatashin Cc: Steven Sistare , Daniel Jordan , linux@armlinux.org.uk, Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , John Stultz , sboyd@codeaurora.org, x86@kernel.org, LKML , mingo@redhat.com, "H. Peter Anvin" , douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, Peter Zijlstra , Prarit Bhargava , feng.tang@intel.com, Petr Mladek , gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko List-ID: On 06/28/2018 06:43 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > For enhanced fun the early calibration stuff was moved from right after > init_hypervisor_platform() to the place where it is now in commit > ccb64941f375a6 ("x86/timers: Move simple_udelay_calibration() past > kvmclock_init()") to speed up KVM boot time by avoiding the PIT > calibration. I have no idea why it wasn't just moved past the XEN > initialization a few lines further down, especially as the change was done > by a XEN maintainer :) Boris? (Sorry for late response, I was out) No good reason for that. I don't know what (whether?) I was thinking. -boris