From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid jump tables
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 13:42:18 +0100
Message-ID: <e7bcc4c5-8447-bafe-dac7-fccd89777ee3@redhat.com>
References: <20180206112127.19014-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
 <7e9bb181-cec9-0781-03c0-b74d5d087c8a@redhat.com>
 <97098ed6-a48e-354f-d146-aca6cf90eed1@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <97098ed6-a48e-354f-d146-aca6cf90eed1@de.ibm.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Archive: <https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
List-ID: <linux-s390.vger.kernel.org>

On 06.02.2018 13:36, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02/06/2018 01:30 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 06.02.2018 12:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> Some old patches refreshed.
>>>
>>
>> Certainly the right thing to do. Especially also interesting due to
>> retpotline (if we get something like that on s390x). If I remember
>> correctly, x86 highly benefits by replacing magic function pointer by
>> switch statements.
>>
>> Should we go ahead and also rework interrupt delivery?
> 
> Yes, that was my plan but I have not started. Do you want to work on that?

Can do if you don't have time for it!


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb