From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Sender: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check References: <1467124991-13164-1-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160706065255.GH30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <577CB786.8000902@suse.com> <20160706081920.GG30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:44:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160706081920.GG30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Peter Zijlstra , Juergen Gross Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org, dave@stgolabs.net, benh@kernel.crashing.org, Pan Xinhui , boqun.feng@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, waiman.long@hpe.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-ID: On 06/07/2016 10:19, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> Paolo, could you help out with an (x86) KVM interface for this? >> > >> > Xen support of this interface should be rather easy. Could you please >> > Cc: xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org in the next version? > So meta question; aren't all you virt people looking at the regular > virtualization list? Or should we really dig out all the various > hypervisor lists and Cc them? I at least skim the subjects. Paolo