From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52182 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725864AbgLMLgp (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Dec 2020 06:36:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch 23/30] net/mlx5: Use effective interrupt affinity References: <20201210192536.118432146@linutronix.de> <20201210194044.876342330@linutronix.de> From: Tariq Toukan Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 13:35:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201210194044.876342330@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: To: Thomas Gleixner , LKML Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Marc Zyngier , Saeed Mahameed , Leon Romanovsky , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , afzal mohammed , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Christian Borntraeger , Heiko Carstens , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Pankaj Bharadiya , Chris Wilson , Wambui Karuga , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Tvrtko Ursulin , Linus Walleij , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones , Jon Mason , Dave Jiang , Allen Hubbe , linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Michal Simek , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Karthikeyan Mitran , Hou Zhiqiang , Tariq Toukan , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/10/2020 9:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Using the interrupt affinity mask for checking locality is not really > working well on architectures which support effective affinity masks. > > The affinity mask is either the system wide default or set by user space, > but the architecture can or even must reduce the mask to the effective set, > which means that checking the affinity mask itself does not really tell > about the actual target CPUs. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Saeed Mahameed > Cc: Leon Romanovsky > Cc: "David S. Miller" > Cc: Jakub Kicinski > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c > @@ -1998,7 +1998,7 @@ static int mlx5e_open_channel(struct mlx > c->num_tc = params->num_tc; > c->xdp = !!params->xdp_prog; > c->stats = &priv->channel_stats[ix].ch; > - c->aff_mask = irq_get_affinity_mask(irq); > + c->aff_mask = irq_get_effective_affinity_mask(irq); > c->lag_port = mlx5e_enumerate_lag_port(priv->mdev, ix); > > netif_napi_add(netdev, &c->napi, mlx5e_napi_poll, 64); > Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan Thanks.