From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vfio-ccw: Prevent quiesce function going into an infinite loop References: <4d5a4b98ab1b41ac6131b5c36de18b76c5d66898.1555449329.git.alifm@linux.ibm.com> <20190417110348.28efc8e3.cohuck@redhat.com> <20190417171311.3478402b@oc2783563651> From: Farhan Ali Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:18:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190417171311.3478402b@oc2783563651> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Halil Pasic , Eric Farman Cc: Cornelia Huck , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, pmorel@linux.ibm.com List-ID: On 04/17/2019 11:13 AM, Halil Pasic wrote: >>> Otherwise, looks good to me. Will queue when I get some ack/r-b. >>> >> I like it, but I feel weird giving an r-b to something I suggested: >> >> Acked-by: Eric Farman >> > I think r-b is fine. You did verify both the design and the > implementation I guess. So I don't see why not. > > How urgent is this. I could give this some love till the end of the > week. Should I @Connie,@Farhan? Having more people review it is always a good thing :) This patch (and other patches in the original series) are queued for 5.2, and 5.1 is not released yet. I would say we have some time. > > I was mostly ignoring these patches so I can't capitalize on my > understanding from reviewing the previous versions and need some time to > say something about it. > > Regards, > Halil >