From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5431D455605 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 08:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791794466; cv=none; b=HdX7pUyagiMHYOUlrR9gDH6OOOLR1TvVW22ThG7Tt4yGqdswdu4rZKg0k+JTzaE0QSp2TgO9LZPiVpoNwNVO9oLwmt+6GsKBxAoXAxcpyytBpQqoT5an7wtJ26L+Sd+qxUvnILrUCPsMQmwYZ6x7uNZuuNtqN8Vv0xENC8dFZwk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791794466; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RcJg1C4Ms3jjb274VpOoc6YVQ1dWjRp2way/Ox+QU3o=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=jjAiBy3ARoZ/HTrMK6qDaCRYlpRVnEhlWrJytUQZYrLKhlfcALvgwImCyy14xS9eYAldcKMu1zTgEfD1zNRedwU2FPfQt4M7S9FIdzaGUbmdqL64rVz9rVrE6EtvqglC7mIlsY11GwgBYFz1eEEv4iXVcSSr2A1CbVhIFuYDLgU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Xo1Mj1Y5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Xo1Mj1Y5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA9CC1F0089B; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 08:41:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791794465; bh=RcJg1C4Ms3jjb274VpOoc6YVQ1dWjRp2way/Ox+QU3o=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=Xo1Mj1Y51uamJLgfFLMdX4aXsvlx6mzW0DZYmn0pmPlHhvX8sGU4vdC7KGHIgkir3 WtwfJOSiKuO5QZ03pcBApHTZ8ziEFJTznH06WoVfxSA8NIvKMmrQgTgvJ/PU9rZN8H ngyJr9Nb+cC1i9MEDA2JXH3a/2QQ98YA634dR2ivWB8HADFMBtzC8cXPO7ZDEYzOvN 8MBFxXSEhwed8rfUeeQtHzaM90QcDaKOqZNeUo+cvMaWyHTHurqkV+6C1TuAdNrdzN pmbk/8zOvlASI15X4Df3no3qStm95vT13uiD+4pHXTm/QJQdgKdozx5G0n57UTn2fw YEWfQZXug+7QQ== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] s390/probes: Fix wrong opcode for cgrb fixup Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Heiko Carstens" Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" , "Christian Borntraeger" , "Vasily Gorbik" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" In-Reply-To: <20261012083629.2109206-2-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20261012083629.2109206-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> <20261012083629.2109206-2-hca@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 08:41:04 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The last byte of the cgrb instruction is 0xe4, however the probes code > compares against 0xe6. Fix it. >=20 > Fixes: 6b169ac9b434 ("s390/kprobes: add support for compare and branch in= structions") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012083629.2109= 206-1-hca@linux.ibm.com?part=3D1