From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:45536 "EHLO
        userp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1728951AbfGLBGQ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 11 Jul 2019 21:06:16 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] zfcp: fixes for the zFCP device driver
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
References: <cover.1562098940.git.bblock@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 21:06:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <cover.1562098940.git.bblock@linux.ibm.com> (Benjamin Block's
        message of "Tue, 2 Jul 2019 23:01:59 +0200")
Message-ID: <yq1pnmg6ozj.fsf@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-s390.vger.kernel.org>
To: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>, Fedor Loshakov <loshakov@linux.ibm.com>, Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org


Benjamin,

> So please consider them for the next cycle. Or should I not have send
> them in that case? Sorry, this step of the process was a bit unclear
> to me.

A fix is a fix. Applied the series to 5.3/scsi-fixes. Thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering