From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C1EC433DB for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail02.groups.io (mail02.groups.io [66.175.222.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA67822C9E for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:21:16 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CA67822C9E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bounce+72012+234+5278000+9232812@lists.elisa.tech X-Received: by 127.0.0.2 with SMTP id WOeiYY5279335xmNvoVm0gFV; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:21:16 -0800 X-Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.20983.1611101829189401121 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:17:09 -0800 X-Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BFAA52BF; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:01:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 1BFAA52BF From: Jonathan Corbet To: Milan Lakhani , lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk, linux-safety@lists.elisa.tech, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, harryxiyou@gmail.com, alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com Cc: Milan Lakhani , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [linux-safety] [PATCH] docs: Change reference that was to removed file In-Reply-To: <1611051980-3834-1-git-send-email-milan.lakhani@codethink.co.uk> References: <1611051980-3834-1-git-send-email-milan.lakhani@codethink.co.uk> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:01:02 -0700 Message-ID: <87y2gopjcx.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: Bulk List-Unsubscribe: Sender: linux-safety@lists.elisa.tech List-Id: Mailing-List: list linux-safety@lists.elisa.tech; contact linux-safety+owner@lists.elisa.tech List-Post: X-Gm-Message-State: j2gHdp7ipHxr0l5x2EYrkjAKx5278000AA= Content-Type: text/plain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lists.elisa.tech; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1611102076; bh=ko4c6e/GGcIUhAW+8nlB3b8lm8H02eGbHUlesapfFpE=; h=Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:Subject:To; b=ns8CPMBqElNJWMxYYtb7wEoAgkq4RwiSTDmo7pvkaUbSn/BvpDvXtHxkV6itxuEe4bH 5eZuMMyFvIHEQN8tzpnktk+8RrBRMgwPnaEtW9DVa8ma+aS468bwuL7pXPBc+wPMAkOPC 1mGbCFTwQiAKMmq+SwHPn1LhJrCqC7stcZE= Milan Lakhani writes: [CC += Rob] > There were two references to > Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.rst for dtb format > information. This file has been removed, so I have changed the links to > Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst for this information, which > itself points to https://elinux.org/Device_Tree_Usage for an overview of > the device tree data format. > > Signed-off-by: Milan Lakhani > --- > Documentation/arm/booting.rst | 2 +- > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/arm/Booting | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/arm/booting.rst b/Documentation/arm/booting.rst > index a226345..5392d01 100644 > --- a/Documentation/arm/booting.rst > +++ b/Documentation/arm/booting.rst > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ it. The recommended placement is in the first 16KiB of RAM. > > The boot loader must load a device tree image (dtb) into system ram > at a 64bit aligned address and initialize it with the boot data. The > -dtb format is documented in Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.rst. > +dtb format is documented in Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst. Except that ... usage-model.rst doesn't actually document the DTB format. Perhaps we should instead substitute a link that does what's promised here? Thanks, jon -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#234): https://lists.elisa.tech/g/linux-safety/message/234 Mute This Topic: https://lists.elisa.tech/mt/79948363/5278000 Group Owner: linux-safety+owner@lists.elisa.tech Unsubscribe: https://lists.elisa.tech/g/linux-safety/unsub [linux-safety@archiver.kernel.org] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-