From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jingoo Han Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 5/8] devfreq: exynos4: Use SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:17:10 +0900 Message-ID: <001501cf4176$3d23daa0$b76b8fe0$%han@samsung.com> References: <1394789408-14648-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <1394789408-14648-6-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <1394789408-14648-6-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Chanwoo Choi' Cc: myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, nm@ti.com, b.zolnierkie@samsaung.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, 'Jingoo Han' List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On Friday, March 14, 2014 6:30 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > > This patch use SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro instead of legacy method. > > Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi > --- > drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c > index 60539e8..e5d2c5a 100644 > --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c > @@ -1247,6 +1247,7 @@ static int exynos4_busfreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > static int exynos4_busfreq_resume(struct device *dev) > { > struct busfreq_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > @@ -1254,9 +1255,10 @@ static int exynos4_busfreq_resume(struct device *dev) > busfreq_mon_reset(data); > return 0; > } > +#endif > > static const struct dev_pm_ops exynos4_busfreq_pm = { > - .resume = exynos4_busfreq_resume, > + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(NULL, exynos4_busfreq_resume) Hi Chanwoo Choi, How about using SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS instead of SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS? SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS is simpler as below. static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(exynos4_busfreq_pm, NULL, exynos4_busfreq_resume); However, if runtime pm functions will be added later, SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS is not necessary. Best regards, Jingoo Han > }; > > static const struct platform_device_id exynos4_busfreq_id[] = { > -- > 1.8.0