From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/13] ARM: S5P64X0: Add new S5P6450 Support Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:21:10 +0900 Message-ID: <005201cb4a88$93214570$b963d050$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1283324960-21629-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <20100901114518.GA20737@trinity.fluff.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:17461 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752790Ab0IBKVA (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2010 06:21:00 -0400 Received: from epmmp1 (mailout3.samsung.com [203.254.224.33]) by mailout3.samsung.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTP id <0L84000JX7EY8900@mailout3.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:20:58 +0900 (KST) Received: from kgenekim ([12.23.103.96]) by mmp1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0L84002QM7EYTS@mmp1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:20:58 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: <20100901114518.GA20737@trinity.fluff.org> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: 'Ben Dooks' Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Ben Dooks wrote: > Hi ;-) > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 04:09:07PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > This patches add basic support for Samsung S5P6450 SoC. > > > > Basically this patch moves mach-s5p6440 (ARCH_S5P6440) to mach-s5p64x0 > > (ARCH_S5P64X0) to support Samsung's new S5P6450 SoC. The > ARCH_S5P64X0 > > can support S5P6440 and S5P6450 with one kernel image. It is tested on > > SMDK6440(S5P6440) and SMDK6450(S5P6450) with s5p64x0_defconfig. And > > this patch changes s5p6440_defconfig to s5p64x0_defconfig for S5P64X0. > > What about the s5p6442? > S5P6440 and S5P6450 are each other similar, but S5P6442 differs much with it. ,,,so remains some issues for it now. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.