From: Jonghun Han <jonghun.han@samsung.com>
To: 'Jonghun Han' <jonghun.han@samsung.com>,
'Jingoo Han' <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, 'Paul Mundt' <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ben-linux@fluff.org, 'Ilho Lee' <ilho215.lee@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] s3c-fb: add support for runtime pm
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:57:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <005d01cba0ed$0ef32460$2cd96d20$%han@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005c01cba0e9$44957220$cdc05660$%han@samsung.com>
Hi Jingoo,
How about adding pm_runtime_* in s3c_fb_blank ?
In FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN state no need to enable clock or power-domain.
Best regards,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-fbdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-fbdev-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jonghun Han
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 5:30 PM
> To: 'Jingoo Han'; linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org; 'Paul Mundt';
linux-samsung-
> soc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: ben-linux@fluff.org; 'Ilho Lee'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] s3c-fb: add support for runtime pm
>
> Hi Jingoo,
>
> Here is a quick review.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jingoo Han wrote:
>
> > This patch adds support for runtime pm using the functions.
> > - pm_runtime_get_sync()
> > - pm_runtime_put_sync()
> >
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() and pm_runtime_put_sync() are called when open
> > or release function of framebufer driver is called to inform the
> > system if
> hardware is
> > idle or not.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/video/s3c-fb.c | 111
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c b/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c index
> f9aca9d..83ce9a0
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c
>
> <snip>
>
> > +static int s3c_fb_release(struct fb_info *info, int user) {
> > + struct s3c_fb_win *win = info->par;
> > + struct s3c_fb *sfb = win->parent;
> > +
> > + pm_runtime_put_sync(sfb->dev);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct fb_ops s3c_fb_ops = {
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > + .fb_open = s3c_fb_open,
> > + .fb_release = s3c_fb_release,
> > .fb_check_var = s3c_fb_check_var,
> > .fb_set_par = s3c_fb_set_par,
> > .fb_blank = s3c_fb_blank,
>
> How about use pm_runtime_put (sfb->dev) instead
> pm_runtime_put_sync(sfb->dev) ?
> In my opinion no need to sync option in *put* case.
>
> > @@ -1322,6 +1345,8 @@ static int __devinit s3c_fb_probe(struct
> platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >
> > clk_enable(sfb->bus_clk);
> >
> > + pm_runtime_enable(sfb->dev);
> > +
> > res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > if (!res) {
> > dev_err(dev, "failed to find registers\n"); @@ -1360,6
> +1385,9
>
> How about move pm_runtime_enable upper pm_runtime_get_sync in
s3c_fb_probe?
>
> > @@ static int __devinit s3c_fb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > dev_dbg(dev, "got resources (regs %p), probing windows\n",
> sfb->regs);
> >
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sfb);
> > + pm_runtime_get_sync(sfb->dev);
> > +
> > /* setup gpio and output polarity controls */
> >
> > pd->setup_gpio();
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sfb); already exists line# 1402.
>
> <snip>
> >
> > @@ -1434,6 +1463,8 @@ static int __devexit s3c_fb_remove(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > struct s3c_fb *sfb = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > int win;
> >
> > + pm_runtime_get_sync(sfb->dev);
> > +
> > for (win = 0; win < S3C_FB_MAX_WIN; win++)
> > if (sfb->windows[win])
> > s3c_fb_release_win(sfb, sfb->windows[win]); @@ -
>
> sfb->variant.nr_windows is better than S3C_FB_MAX_WIN.
>
> > 1450,12 +1481,74 @@ static int __devexit s3c_fb_remove(struct
> platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >
> <snip>
> > +
> > + for (win_no = S3C_FB_MAX_WIN - 1; win_no >= 0; win_no--) {
>
> Ditto
>
> > + win = sfb->windows[win_no];
> > + if (!win)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /* use the blank function to push into power-down */
> > + s3c_fb_blank(FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN, win->fbinfo);
> > + }
> > +
> > + clk_disable(sfb->bus_clk);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int s3c_fb_resume(struct device *dev) {
> > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > + struct s3c_fb *sfb = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + struct s3c_fb_platdata *pd = sfb->pdata;
> > + struct s3c_fb_win *win;
> > + int win_no;
> > +
> > + clk_enable(sfb->bus_clk);
> > +
> > + /* setup registers */
> > + writel(pd->vidcon1, sfb->regs + VIDCON1);
> > +
> > + /* zero all windows before we do anything */
> > + for (win_no = 0; win_no < sfb->variant.nr_windows; win_no++)
> > + s3c_fb_clear_win(sfb, win_no);
>
> Is it right "win_no < sfb->variant.nr_windows" not "nr_windows - 1" ?
Sorry my mistake.
>
> > +
> > + for (win_no = 0; win_no < sfb->variant.nr_windows - 1; win_no++) {
> > + void __iomem *regs = sfb->regs + sfb->variant.keycon;
> > +
> > + regs += (win_no * 8);
> > + writel(0xffffff, regs + WKEYCON0);
> > + writel(0xffffff, regs + WKEYCON1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* restore framebuffers */
> > + for (win_no = 0; win_no < S3C_FB_MAX_WIN; win_no++) {
> > + win = sfb->windows[win_no];
> > + if (!win)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "resuming window %d\n", win_no);
> > + s3c_fb_set_par(win->fbinfo);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> How about merge three for loop ?
So how about merge two for loops ?
>
> In my opinion s3c_fb_blank(FB_BLANK_UNBLANK, win->fbinfo) should be called
> in resume.
> Because sfb->enabled was cleared in suspend function using
> s3c_fb_blank(FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN, win->fbinfo).
>
> <snip>
>
> >
> > @@ -1710,15 +1807,21 @@ static struct platform_device_id
> s3c_fb_driver_ids[] =
> > { }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, s3c_fb_driver_ids);
> >
> > +static const struct dev_pm_ops s3cfb_pm_ops = {
> > + .suspend = s3c_fb_suspend,
> > + .resume = s3c_fb_resume,
> > + .runtime_suspend = s3c_fb_runtime_suspend,
> > + .runtime_resume = s3c_fb_runtime_resume,
> > +};
>
> s3c_fb_suspend and s3c_fb_resume are exactly same with
> s3c_fb_runtime_suspend s3c_fb_runtime_resume.
> Why don't you register the same function ?
>
> <snip>
> >
> > --
> > 1.6.2.5
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev"
> > in
> the body
> > of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body
> of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-21 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-17 7:45 [PATCH] s3c-fb: add support for runtime pm Jingoo Han
2010-12-20 15:58 ` Paul Mundt
2010-12-21 8:30 ` Jonghun Han
2010-12-21 8:57 ` Jonghun Han [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='005d01cba0ed$0ef32460$2cd96d20$%han@samsung.com' \
--to=jonghun.han@samsung.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=ilho215.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox