From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] mach-s5pv210: Add platform definitions for mipi-csis Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 17:32:42 +0900 Message-ID: <014a01cb92c4$a9af62c0$fd0e2840$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1291307862-8125-1-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <1291307862-8125-2-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <012301cb92a1$a7020af0$f50620d0$%kim@samsung.com> <014901cb92c2$d9c9e8b0$8d5dba10$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-reply-to: <014901cb92c2$d9c9e8b0$8d5dba10$%kim@samsung.com> Content-language: ko List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: 'Kukjin Kim' , 'Kyungmin Park' Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Sylwester Nawrocki' , m.szyprowski@samsung.com List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Kukjin Kim wrote: > = > Kyungmin Park wrote: > > One more.. > > > And I'm confused about the name of MIPI-CSI... > > > Hmm...used MIPICSI or MIPI_CSI, sometimes MIPICSIS or MIPI_CSIS. > > > > > > Maybe the meaning is Camera Serial Interface Slave... > > > So...how about to use just one such as "IRQ_MIPI_CSIS" and > > > "S5PV210_PA_MIPI_CSIS". > > > > I think it's better use the common word, CSI. I can't find CSIS word > > at googling. > > > But used it in datasheet. How about FIMC, I think, it depends on usage of > datasheet. > = However, if required, it can be changed... I meant to use written name in datasheet is better to us. > > > > > > --- > > > @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ > > > =A0#define IRQ_HSMMC0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 S5P_IRQ_VIC1(26) > > > =A0#define IRQ_HSMMC1 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 S5P_IRQ_VIC1(27) > > > =A0#define IRQ_HSMMC2 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 S5P_IRQ_VIC1(28) > > > -#define IRQ_MIPICSI =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0S5P_IRQ_VIC1(29) > > > +#define IRQ_MIPI_CSIS =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0S5P_IRQ_VIC1(29) > > > =A0#define IRQ_MIPIDSI =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0S5P_IRQ_VIC1(30) > > > =A0#define IRQ_ONENAND_AUDI =A0 =A0 =A0 S5P_IRQ_VIC1(31) > > > > > > @@ -132,5 +132,6 @@ > > > =A0#define IRQ_LCD_FIFO =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 IRQ_LCD0 > > > =A0#define IRQ_LCD_VSYNC =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0IRQ_LCD1 > > > =A0#define IRQ_LCD_SYSTEM =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 IRQ_LCD2 > > > +#define IRQ_MIPI_CSIS0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 IRQ_MIPI_CSIS > > > > In this case, I can't find any good reason since it's first used. > > as s3c series used the different names compare to s5p series. it's > > okay make these wrapper. > > but it's new one and not used previous time. > > > I already commented about that. > Shortly, IRQ_MIPI_CSIS0 is used as common name for S5PV210 and S5PV310 in > plat-s5p. > And IRQ_MIPI_CSI is used as specific name on S5PV210. So needed it. > = To use IRQ_MIPI_CSIS means just one on S5PV210. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.