From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/33] Use common macro to define resources Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 21:55:23 +0900 Message-ID: <01b201cd2de2$ffa5d7d0$fef18770$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1335327163-11794-1-git-send-email-tushar.behera@linaro.org> <201204250938.58397.heiko@sntech.de> <20120425101007.GM9142@game.jcrosoft.org> <201204251121.47358.arnd@arndb.de> <20120425113521.GW24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]:47271 "EHLO mailout1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752931Ab2EIMzZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 08:55:25 -0400 Received: from epcpsbgm2.samsung.com (mailout1.samsung.com [203.254.224.24]) by mailout1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0M3R00MAUAKCFA40@mailout1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 21:55:24 +0900 (KST) Received: from DOKGENEKIM03 ([12.23.119.152]) by mmp1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPA id <0M3R005NJAKBTD20@mmp1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 21:55:24 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: <20120425113521.GW24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: 'Russell King - ARM Linux' , 'Arnd Bergmann' Cc: 'Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD' , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?'Heiko_St=FCbner'?= , 'Tushar Behera' , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@linaro.org Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:21:47AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Note that the point of the DEFINE_RES_*() macros is really to prevent > > people from coming up with new silly macros to do the same thing, as > > we've had in the past. > > One of the other reaons was to stop the stream of resources with wrong > endings (because people kept thinking it was exclusive rather than > inclusive) - and the resulting stream of additional patches to fix those > errors. > > The legacy platforms do have those kinds of errors - when I converted > SA11x0 as part of a previous patch set, I found a number suffering from > this error. (Were any found in this patch set? I've not read through > it.) > > I think if this becomes a small %age of the change to Samsung stuff, > and Kukjin is happy with it, it should go in. Yes, agree. I will apply this whole series. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.