From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
To: 'Doug Anderson' <dianders@chromium.org>,
'Chirantan Ekbote' <chirantan@chromium.org>
Cc: 'Russell King' <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
'Olof Johansson' <olof@lixom.net>,
'Tomasz Figa' <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
'linux-samsung-soc' <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm: mct: Don't reset the counter during boot and resume
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:47:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <026701cf7f96$ed616a00$c8243e00$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=VfK6DoK53ZBzouoUz-j8COUDUkifEenggC0kkLrJnVcA@mail.gmail.com>
Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Chirantan,
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Chirantan Ekbote
> <chirantan@chromium.org> wrote:
> > Unfortunately on some exynos systems, resetting the mct counter also
> > resets the architected timer counter. This can cause problems if the
> > architected timer driver has already been initialized because the kernel
> > will think that the counter has wrapped around, causing a big jump in
> > printk timestamps and delaying any scheduled clock events until the
> > counter reaches the value it had before it was reset.
> >
> > The kernel code makes no assumptions about the initial value of the mct
> > counter so there is no reason from a software perspective to clear the
> > counter before starting it. This also fixes the problems described in
> > the previous paragraph.
> >
> > Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
> > Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Chirantan Ekbote <chirantan@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c | 9 +++------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> I can confirm that this fixes problems I described in
> <http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg29085.html>. Now
> when I boot there's no mysterious delay and there's no big jump in
> time.
>
> I'd love to see this in 3.16 so we can get rid of this annoying delay.
>
> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
OK, I will queue this patch into fixes for 3.16.
Thanks,
Kukjin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-04 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-03 18:48 [PATCH] arm: mct: Don't reset the counter during boot and resume Chirantan Ekbote
2014-06-03 23:26 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-04 1:47 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='026701cf7f96$ed616a00$c8243e00$@samsung.com' \
--to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=chirantan@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox