From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [Patch v7 0/6] add cpuidle support for Exynos5420 Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 20:52:21 +0900 Message-ID: <03d501cf9522$eaf67200$c0e35600$@samsung.com> References: <1402914383-20471-1-git-send-email-k.chander@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <1402914383-20471-1-git-send-email-k.chander@samsung.com> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Chander Kashyap' , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, tomasz.figa@gmail.com List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Chander Kashyap wrote: > > Exynos5420 is a big-little Soc from Samsung. It has 4 A15 and 4 A7 cores. > > This patchset adds cpuidle support for Exynos5420 SoC based on > generic big.little cpuidle driver. > > Tested on SMDK5420. > Rebased on 3.16-rc1 > > Changelog is in respective patches. > Chander Kashyap (5): > driver: cpuidle-big-little: add of_device_id structure > arm: exynos: add generic function to calculate cpu number > cpuidle: config: Add ARCH_EXYNOS entry to select cpuidle-big-little > driver > driver: cpuidle: cpuidle-big-little: init driver for Exynos5420 > exynos: cpuidle: do not allow cpuidle registration for Exynos5420 > mcpm: exynos: populate suspend and powered_up callbacks > > arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 4 +++- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/mcpm-exynos.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h | 9 +++++++++ > drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 2 +- > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-big_little.c | 12 +++++++++++- > 5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > + Nicolas Hi, This series looks good to me and I asked Chander to test this series with Nico's mcpm patches on smdk5420 and he said it works fine. So I will apply this into samsung tree if Nicolas has no objection on 6/6. BTW, one more, there are duplicated sign-off from Chander with different e-mail address, I'm not sure it should be fine or not because I didn't see same thing before. Thanks, Kukjin