From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:08:07 -0800 Message-ID: <076401cdfe9f$6a0f5fa0$3e2e1ee0$@samsung.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout4.samsung.com ([203.254.224.34]:60815 "EHLO mailout4.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753048Ab3A3EIO (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:08:14 -0500 In-reply-to: Content-language: en-us Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: 'Sachin Kamat' , 'Linus Walleij' Cc: 'LKML' , 'linux-samsung-soc' Sachin Kamat wrote: > > >> This patch is required along with the > >> patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for exynos and exynos5440" > >> (mainline commit Id: e4a5da51) which has already made it into > >> mainline. Without the missing patch we get the following boot up > >> warnings and subsequent failures with dt boot on 4412 based board: > > > > Hm I didn't realize there was a dependency between these > > patches, oh well, better get the pull for the pinctrl tree finished > > off then... > > Ideally those 2 patches should have been squashed together. > Err, Sachin, what are you talking about? As you said, one patch has been merged into the mainline, so how does it can be squashed? In this case, just applying the other patch into pinctrl-fixes is enough. Thanks. - Kukjin