From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Add Kconfig option for Samsung GH7 SoC family Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:07:31 +0100 Message-ID: <116078520.5VTDQYu7BE@wuerfel> References: <1392100183-30930-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <20140220112248.GC32456@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:60076 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751854AbaBTMIO (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 07:08:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140220112248.GC32456@localhost> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Olof Johansson , John Stultz , Kukjin Kim , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Ilho Lee , Thomas Abraham , Kumar Gala , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner On Thursday 20 February 2014 11:22:48 Catalin Marinas wrote: > > I'm fine with this. Do we still need something for ARMv8 server > platforms like ARCH_ARM_SBSA? The only advantage would be to make it > easier for mobile targeted kernel builds to disable server features but > I'm not sure there are so many such features, people can trim the > .config manually. I think in particular for SBSA compliant platforms we should not have per-platform options at all the way we do for embedded, as they will be much more homogenous. > Two additional points: > > 1. Single arm64 defconfig file covering everything > 2. Modules rather than built-in by default where possible (especially > for server platforms) +1 Arnd