From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ameya Palande <ameya.palande@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Samsung device-table approach
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:40:27 +0300
Message-ID: <1281530427.1918.124.camel@chotu>
References: <1281528238-7298-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mgw-sa02.nokia.com ([147.243.1.48]:38570 "EHLO
	mgw-sa02.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751542Ab0HKMkx (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:40:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1281528238-7298-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
To: ext Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "kyungmin.park@samsung.com" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>, "kgene.kim@samsung.com" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, "ben-linux@fluff.org" <ben-linux@fluff.org>

Hi Marek,

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 14:03 +0200, ext Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I would like to start the discussion on the redesign of the way the
> Samsung platform devices are defined. The current solution has some
> important disadvantages that blocks the further kernel development.

Forgive me about my ignorance about device tables, but I was wondering
if there is any similarity between device tables and Simple Firmware
Interface tables which are already in mainline?

Cheers,
Ameya.