From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Bolle Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/28] Remove MACH_SMDKC210 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:30:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1392046242.3585.41.camel@x220> References: <1391971686-9517-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1391971686-9517-15-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <20140210114154.GQ1757@sirena.org.uk> <1392039072.3585.15.camel@x220> <20140210141255.GI1757@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cpsmtpb-ews02.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.5]:55719 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews02.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751831AbaBJPao (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:30:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140210141255.GI1757@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Richard Weinberger , Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , Sangbeom Kim , Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:12 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:31:12PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > If so, to be absolutely sure we start from the same point: do you agree > > that the above line now effectively reads > > depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG && (MACH_SMDK6410 || MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDKV210 || MACH_SMDKC110 || false || false) > > > because there's neither a Kconfig symbol MACH_SMDKV310 nor a Kconfig > > symbol MACH_SMDKC210? > > Yes, that's correct. Now, like I say think about what the symbol was > there for in the first place. So, next step: the Kconfig symbols MACH_SMDKV310 and MACH_SMDKC210 were removed in commit 383ffda2fa ("ARM: EXYNOS: no more support non-DT for EXYNOS SoCs"). That commit was part of v3.11. Correct? Thanks for your patience. Paul Bolle