From: Youngmin Nam <ym0914@gmail.com>
To: tomasz.figa@gmail.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, kgene@kernel.org,
thomas.ab@samsung.com
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Youngmin Nam <ym0914@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Fixes samsung_gpio_direction_in/output releated with spinlock
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:21:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453130462-3621-1-git-send-email-ym0914@gmail.com> (raw)
Previously, samsung_gpio_drection_in/output function were not covered with
one spinlock.
For example, samsung_gpio_direction_output function consists of two functions.
1. samsung_gpio_set
2. samsung_gpio_set_direction
When 2 CPUs try to control the same gpio pin heavily,
(situation like i2c control with gpio emulation)
This situation can cause below problem.
CPU 0 | CPU1
|
samsung_gpio_direction_output |
samsung_gpio_set(pin A as 1) | samsung_gpio_direction_output
| samsung_gpio_set(pin A as 0)
samsung_gpio_set_direction |
| samsung_gpio_set_direction
The initial value of pin A will be set as 0 while we wanted to set pin A as 1.
This patch modifies samsung_gpio_direction_in/output function
to be done in one spinlock to fix race condition.
Additionally, gpio set callback was changed with samsung_gpio_set_value
to implement gpio set callback with spinlock using samsung_gpio_set.
Signed-off-by: Youngmin Nam <ym0914@gmail.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
index 48294e7..a25f6f6 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
@@ -524,20 +524,26 @@ static void samsung_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset, int value)
{
struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = gc_to_pin_bank(gc);
const struct samsung_pin_bank_type *type = bank->type;
- unsigned long flags;
void __iomem *reg;
u32 data;
reg = bank->drvdata->virt_base + bank->pctl_offset;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
-
data = readl(reg + type->reg_offset[PINCFG_TYPE_DAT]);
data &= ~(1 << offset);
if (value)
data |= 1 << offset;
writel(data, reg + type->reg_offset[PINCFG_TYPE_DAT]);
+}
+
+static void samsung_gpio_set_value(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+ unsigned offset, int value)
+{
+ struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = gc_to_pin_bank(gc);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
+ samsung_gpio_set(gc, offset, value);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags);
}
@@ -569,7 +575,6 @@ static int samsung_gpio_set_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc,
struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata;
void __iomem *reg;
u32 data, mask, shift;
- unsigned long flags;
bank = gc_to_pin_bank(gc);
type = bank->type;
@@ -586,31 +591,42 @@ static int samsung_gpio_set_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc,
reg += 4;
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
-
data = readl(reg);
data &= ~(mask << shift);
if (!input)
data |= FUNC_OUTPUT << shift;
writel(data, reg);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags);
-
return 0;
}
/* gpiolib gpio_direction_input callback function. */
static int samsung_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
{
- return samsung_gpio_set_direction(gc, offset, true);
+ struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = gc_to_pin_bank(gc);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
+ ret = samsung_gpio_set_direction(gc, offset, true);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags);
+ return ret;
}
/* gpiolib gpio_direction_output callback function. */
static int samsung_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset,
int value)
{
+ struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = gc_to_pin_bank(gc);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
samsung_gpio_set(gc, offset, value);
- return samsung_gpio_set_direction(gc, offset, false);
+ ret = samsung_gpio_set_direction(gc, offset, false);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags);
+
+ return ret;
}
/*
@@ -891,7 +907,7 @@ static int samsung_pinctrl_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
static const struct gpio_chip samsung_gpiolib_chip = {
.request = gpiochip_generic_request,
.free = gpiochip_generic_free,
- .set = samsung_gpio_set,
+ .set = samsung_gpio_set_value,
.get = samsung_gpio_get,
.direction_input = samsung_gpio_direction_input,
.direction_output = samsung_gpio_direction_output,
--
2.7.0.25.gfc10eb5
next reply other threads:[~2016-01-18 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-18 15:21 Youngmin Nam [this message]
2016-01-22 4:27 ` [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Fixes samsung_gpio_direction_in/output releated with spinlock Tomasz Figa
2016-01-24 5:23 ` Youngmin Nam
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-17 7:41 Youngmin Nam
2016-01-18 3:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1453130462-3621-1-git-send-email-ym0914@gmail.com \
--to=ym0914@gmail.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox