From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jassi brar Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 01/10] ARM: S3C2443: GPIO: Correct AC97 pin defines Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:37:12 +0900 Message-ID: <1b68c6791001270237w6e312ceck40e117a6dfc68d7a@mail.gmail.com> References: <1264571873-14924-1-git-send-email-jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> <20100127081140.GK9153@trinity.fluff.org> <1b68c6791001270015o4d5f42b8k858b959816c9b7c9@mail.gmail.com> <20100127102946.GA13745@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:59354 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932142Ab0A0KhN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:37:13 -0500 Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so145326vws.19 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:37:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100127102946.GA13745@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Ben Dooks , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Jassi Brar On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:15:28PM +0900, jassi brar wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Ben Dooks wro= te: >> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:57:53PM +0900, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com= wrote: >> >> From: Jassi Brar >> >> >> >> GPIO_E-[5,9] pin functionality was defined incorrectly. >> >> The patch corrects and adds missing pins. >> > >> > Ok, should I apply this to the fixes tree and send to linus? >> Honestly speaking, I don't know. Please do as you see due. >> Maybe Mark Brown, as an affected maintainer, has some opinion? > > Might've wanted to CC me there... :) =C2=A0If they're just plain wron= g then > it should probably go to Linus, though equally well nobody's been > complaining about it. yes, I missed to cc u on the first patch by mistake.