From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 01/10] ARM: S3C2443: GPIO: Correct AC97 pin defines Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:29:47 +0000 Message-ID: <20100127102946.GA13745@sirena.org.uk> References: <1264571873-14924-1-git-send-email-jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> <20100127081140.GK9153@trinity.fluff.org> <1b68c6791001270015o4d5f42b8k858b959816c9b7c9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:48571 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754023Ab0A0K3x (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:29:53 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1b68c6791001270015o4d5f42b8k858b959816c9b7c9@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: jassi brar Cc: Ben Dooks , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Jassi Brar On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:15:28PM +0900, jassi brar wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Ben Dooks wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:57:53PM +0900, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com wrote: > >> From: Jassi Brar > >> > >> GPIO_E-[5,9] pin functionality was defined incorrectly. > >> The patch corrects and adds missing pins. > > > > Ok, should I apply this to the fixes tree and send to linus? > Honestly speaking, I don't know. Please do as you see due. > Maybe Mark Brown, as an affected maintainer, has some opinion? Might've wanted to CC me there... :) If they're just plain wrong then it should probably go to Linus, though equally well nobody's been complaining about it.