From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] sdhci-s3c: depend on plat-samsung Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:30:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20100611103047.GC12436@sirena.org.uk> References: <1276076383-24825-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <1276076383-24825-2-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <000701cb08fd$2f8e15a0$8eaa40e0$%kim@samsung.com> <20100611052407.GX7248@trinity.fluff.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100611052407.GX7248@trinity.fluff.org> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ben Dooks Cc: Kukjin Kim , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Marek Szyprowski' List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:24:07AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > Hmm, Mr Park and Co really need to learn how to handle the treatment of > patches. I'm really disapointed that these patches get submitted without > the proper authour accreditation. If this isn't sorted out then I for > one will start thinking about giving this stuff an automatic reject. For this specific patch it looks more like the patch was sufficiently straightforward that two different people ended up coming up with identical implementations rather than anything else?