From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC 9/9] crypto: Add Samsung crypto engine driver Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:45:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100813.144537.102558594.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4C63DF4C.1020501@gmail.com> <20100812.153208.48514514.davem@davemloft.net> <4C6529E1.8020300@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:41310 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753343Ab0HMVpT (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:45:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C6529E1.8020300@gmail.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: mcuelenaere@gmail.com Cc: kmpark@infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au From: Maurus Cuelenaere Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:17:53 +0200 > Op 13-08-10 00:32, David Miller schreef: >> From: Maurus Cuelenaere >> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:47:24 +0200 >> >> tcrypt can validate async crypto algorithms, but cannot performance >> test them just yet. I can performance test async hash algorithms, >> for which I added the code for a few months ago. > Hmm ok, I suppose implementing support for performance testing async crypto > algorithms isn't trivial? It shouldn't be that hard, the issue is simply that nobody has put the time in to do the work yet.