From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] ARM: VExpress: Switch to generic SCU routines Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:27:23 +0000 Message-ID: <20101130232723.GA14383@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20101130171626.GA6165@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20101130171701.GC24034@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101130171701.GC24034@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Anton Vorontsov Cc: Kukjin Kim , Srinidhi Kasagar , Tony Lindgren , Catalin Marinas , Jamie Iles , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Colin Cross , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 08:17:01PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > +/* If there are more than one CPU let them know where to start. */ > +static void __init smp_point_cpus(void) > +{ > + if (num_present_cpus() <= 1) > + return; > > - for (i = 0; i < ncores; i++) > - set_cpu_possible(i, true); > + writel(~0, MMIO_P2V(V2M_SYS_FLAGSCLR)); > + writel(BSYM(virt_to_phys(scu_secondary_startup)), > + MMIO_P2V(V2M_SYS_FLAGSSET)); > } I don't see the point of separating this code from the code below. It doesn't seem to bring any benefit. Could you explain why it's necessary to separate this? > void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) > { ...