Re: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 01:38:24PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 8:58 AM
> > To: Kukjin Kim
> > Cc: 'Jingoo Han'; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> > usb@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; gregkh@suse.de;
> > stern@rowland.harvard.edu; 'Yulgon Kim'; 'Shim Joonyoung'
> > Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and driver
> > 
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 07:10:17PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > Greg KH wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 4:12 AM
> > > > > > To: Jingoo Han
> > > > > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> > usb@vger.kernel.org;
> > > > > > linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; gregkh@suse.de;
> > > > > > stern@rowland.harvard.edu; kgene.kim@samsung.com;
> > > > yulgon.kim@samsung.com;
> > > > > > jy0922.shim@samsung.com
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support Samsung S5P OHCI device and
> > driver
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 06:49:58AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This patch series adds USB OHCI device and initial driver for
> > > > Samsung
> > > > > > > S5P SoCs and is based from Linux 3.2-rc1. I have tested on
> > SMDKV310
> > > > > > board
> > > > > > > using EXYNOS4.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is to be sent through some arm tree, not the usb tree, right?
> > > > > Right, 1st and 2nd patch are sent throught arm tree.
> > > > > However, 3rd patch is sent through the usb tree.
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add USB OHCI device
> > > > > [PATCH 2/3]  ARM: EXYNOS: Add USB OHCI support to SMDKV310 board
> > > > > [PATCH 3/3] USB: Add S5P OHCI diver
> > > >
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > Sorry for late response. I came back today from family vacation...
> > >
> > > Anyway,
> > >
> > > > So the third patch does not depend on the first two?  If it does, that
> > > > means I will get build errors in the USB tree when I apply that patch,
> > > > right?
> > > >
> > > > If so, then all three should go through a single tree.
> > > >
> > > Yes, right. This series would be handled in same tree so that we can
> > avoid
> > > useless conflicts.
> > >
> > > I commented small thing on 3rd patch. So I think, if you're ok on his
> > > updated patch, it can be sent to upstream via Samsung tree. Or your tree
> > > with my ack?
> > 
> > The samsung tree is fine to take these, thanks.
> > 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> OK, let me pick this up in my tree...so, when I apply, may I can have a ack
> from you on 3rd patch?

Yes, feel free to add:
	Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>