From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] Use common macro to define resources Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:19:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20120425041939.GL9142@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <1335327163-11794-1-git-send-email-tushar.behera@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1335327163-11794-1-git-send-email-tushar.behera@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Tushar Behera , Arnd Bergmann Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@linaro.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 09:42 Wed 25 Apr , Tushar Behera wrote: > There are some helper macros (DEFINE_RES_XXX) for defining resource > structures. This patchset migrates all the earlier resource > definitions (within Samsung specific code base) to use these macros. > > In some cases, it was not possible to use DEFINE_RES_IRQ() macro because > of usage of additional flags. In those cases, DEFINE_RES_NAMED() macro > is used instead. > > The patches are rebased on top of Kukjin's for-next branch at this commit. > > d0ee53a Merge branch 'next/board-samsung' into for-next is this really necessary as we switch to DT this code will be droped for my point of view it's cosmetics change Arnd what do you think? Best Regards, J.