From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 0/4] PCIe support for Samsung Exynos5440 SoC Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:30:47 +0200 Message-ID: <201306211030.47440.arnd@arndb.de> References: <003901ce6e50$03d039a0$0b70ace0$@samsung.com> <201306210931.58428.arnd@arndb.de> <20130621094723.312bc331@skate> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:55294 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161250Ab3FUIb0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jun 2013 04:31:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130621094723.312bc331@skate> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Jingoo Han , 'Kukjin Kim' , 'Bjorn Helgaas' , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 'Grant Likely' , 'Andrew Murray' , 'Thierry Reding' , 'Jason Gunthorpe' , 'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla' , 'Siva Reddy Kallam' , 'Thomas Abraham' , 'Tomasz Figa' , 'Pratyush Anand' , 'Mohit KUMAR' , Jason Cooper On Friday 21 June 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > I am by far not an expert on how to solve merge strategies and so on, > but to avoid conflicts at Linus's level while merging the arm-soc and > pci trees, it would be better if this Samsung PCIe driver could go > through arm-soc (with Bjorn ACK, of course), so that Arnd/Olof can > make sure the ordering is correct with regard to the of/pci changes and > the mvebu/pci driver. Yes, good point. The alternative would be that Bjorn also takes the PCI branch dependencies that are already in arm-soc into his tree. Either way works, but I agree that what you suggest would be simpler. Arnd