From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Add Kconfig option for Samsung GH7 SoC family Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:38:24 +0000 Message-ID: <20140212103824.GF29702@arm.com> References: <1392100183-30930-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <1392100183-30930-3-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from fw-tnat.austin.arm.com ([217.140.110.23]:24211 "EHLO collaborate-mta1.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750963AbaBLKia (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 05:38:30 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: Kukjin Kim , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Ilho Lee , Thomas Abraham On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:39:27PM +0000, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > This patch adds support for Samsung GH7 SoC in arm64/Kconfig. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim > > Cc: Catalin Marinas > > The overhead of building one more device tree isn't very large, and I > don't see any other need to have a Kconfig entry per SoC at this time. > It's of course up to Catalin, but you might just want to always > compile all dts files instead. For arm64, I thought of getting rid of ARCH_* Kconfig entries entirely, only that I haven't heard any strong opinion either way (in which case I'll do it, with a risk of single Image getting bigger and bigger and people needing smaller Image can trim their .config). -- Catalin