From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Add Kconfig option for Samsung GH7 SoC family Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:58:05 +0000 Message-ID: <20140220185805.GI7651@arm.com> References: <1392100183-30930-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <5302B306.8090503@samsung.com> <6032891.ndY8FikAMY@wuerfel> <20140220112248.GC32456@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from fw-tnat.austin.arm.com ([217.140.110.23]:59097 "EHLO collaborate-mta1.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754166AbaBTS6R (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:58:17 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: John Stultz , Arnd Bergmann , Kukjin Kim , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Ilho Lee , Thomas Abraham , Kumar Gala , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 05:09:59PM +0000, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Catalin Marinas > > Two additional points: > > > > 1. Single arm64 defconfig file covering everything > > 2. Modules rather than built-in by default where possible (especially > > for server platforms) > > Sounds good to me. Are you also willing to pick up one defconfig per > vendor (but not more)? I think it's been useful to have those on arm, > even on multiplatform kernels. We used them on powerpc as well, where > we had a two-layer approach (ppc64_defconfig and per-platform configs, > pseries/iseries/pasemi/g5/cell). Initially I would keep a single defconfig with everything just to get wider coverage of single Image. Later on, if just deselecting config entries doesn't work, we can revisit per-vendor defconfigs. -- Catalin