From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Padovan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] removal of extra abstraction layers Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:03:22 -0200 Message-ID: <20141208170322.GA31894@joana> References: <1416853266-10584-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org> <20141202123847.GA9426@joana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.216.49]:38340 "EHLO mail-qa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750908AbaLHRD3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:03:29 -0500 Received: by mail-qa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id s7so3589542qap.36 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 09:03:28 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Airlie Cc: Inki Dae , linux-samsung-soc , Gustavo Padovan , dri-devel Hi Inki, 2014-12-06 Dave Airlie : > On 2 December 2014 at 22:38, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > Hi Inki, > > > > Can you please review this? I also have sent other two patch sets that sits on > > top of this one. Thanks. > > Inki, any plans on when you can get to looking at this? > > I think cleaning up exynos so we can get atomic using it is something > that will benefit it heavily. Besides these patches I have other two clean up patchsets[0][1] that are very important for atomic support, can you review these two too? [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg39614.html [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg39632.html Gustavo