From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] cpufreq: make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attr available when boost is enabled Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:11:56 +0530 Message-ID: <20150807104156.GE6939@linux> References: <1438868514-8814-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <1438868514-8814-2-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <20150807034128.GE6325@linux> <5184469.cOpIkgzX4h@amdc1976> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47]:36218 "EHLO mail-pa0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751667AbbHGKmD (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 06:42:03 -0400 Received: by pacrr5 with SMTP id rr5so50207691pac.3 for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 03:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5184469.cOpIkgzX4h@amdc1976> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Thomas Abraham , Sylwester Nawrocki , Michael Turquette , Kukjin Kim , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Tomasz Figa , Lukasz Majewski , Heiko Stuebner , Chanwoo Choi , Kevin Hilman , Javier Martinez Canillas , Tobias Jakobi , Anand Moon , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Javier Martinez Canillas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" On 07-08-15, 12:34, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > I would suggest you sending such patches as reply to the earlier > > threads only, instead of a new chain. This will save your time. > > Please explain it more. This patch needs to be first for cpufreq-dt > switch to be complete. scaling_boost_freqs is available currently > for exynos-cpufreq users when boost is enabled and ideally we would > like it to be available immediately after the switch to cpufreq-dt. I wasn't talking about the ordering of the patches here, but when to send patches. So, you now sent these patches again, but what you could have done is: only send the first patch in reply to the earlier thread. And ask if it looks fine. If yes, resend the whole series properly or keep fixing there only.. That makes things really fast. You don't have to resend the series and people wouldn't stay away from it. I stayed away from this series to find enough available time to see your 6 patches. Had it been just a reply, I would have replied immediately like now. Look at how updated versions in the same mail chain in case of OPP series.. -- viresh