From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] mfd: ChromeOS EC Kconfig dependency cleanup Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:13:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20150810161301.GA13253@x1> References: <1435191645-6022-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <20150810161009.GG12631@x1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150810161009.GG12631@x1> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Heiko Stuebner , Paul Gortmaker , Gwendal Grignou , Doug Anderson , Linux Kernel , Samuel Ortiz , Olof Johansson List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 07 Aug 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas > > wrote: > > > > > > This is a trivial series that do some changes to the dependency f= or the > > > ChromeOS EC drivers Kconfig symbols. The patches are on top of Pa= ul's > > > patch "mfd: fix dependency warning for CHROME_PLATFORMS on !X86, = !ARM": > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/20/219. > > > > > > Paul fixed a warning about unmet dependencies but I think the cor= rect fix > > > is to remove unneded dependencies. So that is what this series do= and are > > > composed of the following patches: > > > > > > > > > Javier Martinez Canillas (3): > > > platform/chrome: Don't make CHROME_PLATFORMS depends on X86 || = ARM > > > mfd: Remove MFD_CROS_EC depends on X86 || ARM > > > mfd: Remove MFD_CROS_EC_SPI depends on OF > > > > > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 3 +-- > > > drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig | 1 - > > > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > >=20 > > The warning that this series fixes has appeared again in linux-next= =2E > > You said some time ago that applied the patches for 4.3 [0] and ind= eed > > I remember the warning going away at some point. > >=20 > > Do you know what happened with this patches? I see 3/3 in linux-nex= t > > but no 1/3 and 2/3. >=20 > No idea why you're not seeing them. They are in my -fixes branch, > which is pulled into -next. I have _just_ sent them to Linus for > inclusion into v4.2. Okay, scrap that. It likes like MFD -fixes isn't pulled into -next. I'll see what I can do about that. > Let me know if you still see the issue. >=20 > > [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/25/115 > >=20 > > Thanks a lot and best regards, > > Javier >=20 --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog