Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] irqchip: exynos_combiner: fixup reg access on be

[Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>]

Matt, Ben,

Both of you submitted similar patches for the same driver, same purpose.
Since Ben's hit my inbox first, I'll take his.

thx,

Jason.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 05:57:01PM +0100, Matthew Leach wrote:
> Use the byte-order aware big endian accessors, allowing for kernels
> running under big-endian.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Leach <matthew@mattleach.net>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> ---
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> CC: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
> CC: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> CC: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
> CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> CC: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c b/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c
> index ead15be..97ae34c 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c
> @@ -55,14 +55,14 @@ static void combiner_mask_irq(struct irq_data *data)
>  {
>  	u32 mask = 1 << (data->hwirq % 32);
>  
> -	__raw_writel(mask, combiner_base(data) + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR);
> +	writel_relaxed(mask, combiner_base(data) + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR);
>  }
>  
>  static void combiner_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *data)
>  {
>  	u32 mask = 1 << (data->hwirq % 32);
>  
> -	__raw_writel(mask, combiner_base(data) + COMBINER_ENABLE_SET);
> +	writel_relaxed(mask, combiner_base(data) + COMBINER_ENABLE_SET);
>  }
>  
>  static void combiner_handle_cascade_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static void combiner_handle_cascade_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>  
>  	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> -	status = __raw_readl(chip_data->base + COMBINER_INT_STATUS);
> +	status = readl_relaxed(chip_data->base + COMBINER_INT_STATUS);
>  	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  	status &= chip_data->irq_mask;
>  
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void __init combiner_init_one(struct combiner_chip_data *combiner_data,
>  	combiner_data->parent_irq = irq;
>  
>  	/* Disable all interrupts */
> -	__raw_writel(combiner_data->irq_mask, base + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR);
> +	writel_relaxed(combiner_data->irq_mask, base + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR);
>  }
>  
>  static int combiner_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int combiner_suspend(void)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < max_nr; i++)
>  		combiner_data[i].pm_save =
> -			__raw_readl(combiner_data[i].base + COMBINER_ENABLE_SET);
> +			readl_relaxed(combiner_data[i].base + COMBINER_ENABLE_SET);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -235,10 +235,10 @@ static void combiner_resume(void)
>  	int i;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < max_nr; i++) {
> -		__raw_writel(combiner_data[i].irq_mask,
> -			     combiner_data[i].base + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR);
> -		__raw_writel(combiner_data[i].pm_save,
> -			     combiner_data[i].base + COMBINER_ENABLE_SET);
> +		writel_relaxed(combiner_data[i].irq_mask,
> +			       combiner_data[i].base + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR);
> +		writel_relaxed(combiner_data[i].pm_save,
> +			       combiner_data[i].base + COMBINER_ENABLE_SET);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.8.3
>