Linux Samsung SOC development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Cc: "moderated list:ARM/S5P EXYNOS AR..."
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Enrico Weigelt" <enrico.weigelt@gr13.net>,
	"Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	"Seung-Woo Kim" <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>,
	"Tobias Jakobi" <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] New feature: Framebuffer processors
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:57:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160824115711.GD10980@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57BD8898.9000709@samsung.com>

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:44:24PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 2016년 08월 23일 18:41에 Daniel Stone 이(가) 쓴 글:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 22 August 2016 at 16:23, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I guess a lot comes down to 'how long before hw designers bolt a CP to
> >> the thing'..  at that point, I think you especially don't want a
> >> per-blit kernel interface.
> > 
> > Regardless of whether or not we want it, we already _have_ it, in the
> > form of V4L2 M2M. There are already a few IP blocks working on that, I
> > believe. If V4L2 <-> KMS interop is painful, well, we need to fix that
> > anyway ...
> 
> So we are trying this. We had expereneced using V4L2 and DRM together on
> Linux Platform makes it too complicated, and also integrated DRM with
> M2M such as 2D and Post processor makes it simplified.  So We have been
> trying to move existing V4L2 based drivers into DRM excepting HW Video
> Codec - called it MFC - and Camera sensor and relevant things.
> I think now V4L2 and DRM frameworks may make many engineers confusing
> because there are the same devices which can be controlled by V4L2 and
> DRM frameworks - maybe we would need more efforts like Laurent did with
> Live source[1] in the future.

Can you pls explain in more detail where working with both v4l and drm
drivers and making them cooperate using dma-bufs poses problems? We should
definitely fix that.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-24 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-22  9:44 [RFC 0/2] New feature: Framebuffer processors Marek Szyprowski
2016-08-22  9:44 ` [RFC 1/2] drm: add support for framebuffer processors Marek Szyprowski
2016-08-22  9:44 ` [RFC 2/2] drm/exynos: register rotator as fbproc instead of custom ipp framework Marek Szyprowski
2016-08-22  9:44 ` [RFC libdrm] add support for framebuffer processor (fbproc) objects Marek Szyprowski
2016-08-22  9:44 ` [RFC code example] example code for testing fbproc drivers Marek Szyprowski
2016-08-22  9:59 ` [RFC 0/2] New feature: Framebuffer processors Christian König
2016-08-22 14:59   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-22 15:23   ` Rob Clark
2016-08-22 15:30     ` Benjamin Gaignard
2016-08-23  9:41     ` Daniel Stone
2016-08-24 11:44       ` Inki Dae
2016-08-24 11:57         ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2016-08-25  8:06           ` Inki Dae
2016-08-25  8:42             ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-25 11:45               ` Inki Dae
2016-08-25 12:14                 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-30  5:52                   ` Inki Dae
2016-08-22 10:07 ` Tobias Jakobi
2016-08-22 10:50   ` Marek Szyprowski
2016-08-22 11:38     ` Tobias Jakobi
2016-08-22 20:05 ` Dave Airlie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160824115711.GD10980@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=enrico.weigelt@gr13.net \
    --cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox