From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Subject: Re: Revert "dmaengine: pl330: add DMA_PAUSE feature" Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 12:51:12 +0530 Message-ID: <20180518072112.GG2932@vkoul-mobl> References: <06f54061-c537-b399-e493-ec2cdf4def5d@samsung.com> <20180515062144.GC13271@vkoul-mobl> <20180517041946.GQ13271@vkoul-mobl> <20180518040349.GB2932@vkoul-mobl> <7f0b7404-ee12-977f-02a4-a463d1873aee@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7f0b7404-ee12-977f-02a4-a463d1873aee@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: Frank Mori Hess , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , r.baldyga@hackerion.com, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Linux Samsung SOC List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 18-05-18, 08:28, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > Okay, I see that in theory, there are some tricky bits in implementing DMA > support in UART drivers. On the other hand there are already drivers > with seems > to be working fine. This discussion is about revert of the feature > present in > pl330 driver, which is required by other in-kernel driver without proper > fix to > them. > > Can we drop it for now and discuss what and how should be implemented to > make > everyone happy, without any regressions? Sure am dropping the revert, we can always bring it back if it is required -- ~Vinod