From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-03.smtp.spacemail.com (out-03.smtp.spacemail.com [63.250.43.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D01C317FAC2; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=63.250.43.88 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733156102; cv=none; b=I9WllrxTxaBn5m+oZzTCb4Zs+UY0sIkeriUkI1iXMY/fNmCSdb5+FfkcaROBaMy9w4pDPx+NhZFy3+PJp8v/YxkN8WfkN3CY+VslOgBG2ChRxJbALbnPIEkEgI5l+/h6XOA5Yy2mr5qwvFOlQUVjhPnCg08Qz1ZzJPxC0m8i1yY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733156102; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rf3tmdsNPhNTXCWTXYttONTJQUg5LXdbItehquCHLoI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=umI/kT1MubDq/+zTwGgPvTaSR29PbXlVk55oHOgjIjIdeJF+7kFWdQhelwZxUzX+/XU7Ciy3esSibuMTtkNUbzF2GZEByrGemK/kTuNtczacylqweUu4OuEa1qLn+UQEsmdkBgDs54Nn7rUmYMDggftPEpIQQQ1yTRTuep/ZvaM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mentallysanemainliners.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mentallysanemainliners.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mentallysanemainliners.org header.i=@mentallysanemainliners.org header.b=E/bVuty0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=63.250.43.88 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mentallysanemainliners.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mentallysanemainliners.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mentallysanemainliners.org header.i=@mentallysanemainliners.org header.b="E/bVuty0" Received: from prod-lbout-phx.jellyfish.systems (unknown [198.177.122.3]) by smtp.spacemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4Y27tj4c7CzGp3g; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 16:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from umer-b550pro4.lan (host-213-78-252-153.as13285.net [213.78.252.153]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.spacemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Y27tY2H9zz6tkK; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:05:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mentallysanemainliners.org; s=spacemail; t=1733155560; bh=rf3tmdsNPhNTXCWTXYttONTJQUg5LXdbItehquCHLoI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=E/bVuty0ksgZbd+R3sKLadsOLuXj9zd02pmVZghBvEktX0XXII9fLQCOgKbmBFXB+ RdhUl2Vx2ickBwg0E9GZhEWO9hnhuhyRXGH+eSQ4io+fzWLeiot1rgzclGOSjcuXjJ tGgemc2GLr/p2Cv6aSK9KGzuG3NLXbXhd383dHiaekyLYAcAYhS0wJ5qELxyEEBJYt MH0KrR8AIOgxKROvRGNuGJ5jwd4rSq1jsGQ1REqKky4dQmsWxsf+qP1Sblz9M65UVS /mmV+nJ9kPmqff15FFflHeiYQ1Bm01cuwZsXc3bAOMDqzLAM1xYEEbbrmzrnq+02yP lIBNr9yS8+cgg== From: Umer Uddin To: ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com Cc: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org, krzk@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, umer.uddin@mentallysanemainliners.org Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: dts: exynos: Add initial support for Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (x1s) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:05:48 +0000 Message-ID: <20241202160548.3672-1-umer.uddin@mentallysanemainliners.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.1 In-Reply-To: <9f48459e-f381-446a-86bf-c8d1bb8858bc@gmail.com> References: <9f48459e-f381-446a-86bf-c8d1bb8858bc@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 14/11/2024 10:09, Ivaylo Ivanov wrote: >> + >> +/ { >> + #address-cells = <2>; >> + #size-cells = <2>; >> + >> + model = "Samsung Galaxy S20 5G"; >> + compatible = "samsung,x1s", "samsung,exynos990"; >> + >> + memory@80000000 { >> + device_type = "memory"; >> + reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x3ab00000>, >> + /* Memory hole */ >> + <0x0 0xc1200000 0x0 0x1ee00000>, >> + /* Memory hole */ >> + <0x0 0xe1900000 0x0 0x1e700000>, >> + /* Memory hole */ > > The space from 0x100000000 to 0x880000000 isn't a hole in the memory > though, is it? 0x880000000 is in the 64 bit address space. > > Best regards, Ivo. Hi Ivo, This device tree was based on the work done on c1s and Igor had also labelled the part as a memory hole, also same with the r8s device tree done by Denzeel, also downstream fdt skips out on this region abruptly hence why I had also labelled it a memory hole.