Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Samsung mfd/rtc driver alarm IRQ simplification

Lee Jones
2026-01-21T08:49:02Z

On Tue, 20 Jan 2026, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 05:24:05PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2026, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > If you fetch a series but don't delete it from the database then (with
> > > b4 ty -d) then b4 will remember it and if any commits in what gets
> > > applied match it'll generate a mail for b4 ty -a. Usually that's when
> > > some commits didn't get changed.
>
> > The last attempt to apply this failed with conflicts.
>
> > I wonder why b4 stored that as a success?
>
> Are you using b4 shazam? I wonder if under the hood it's a mailbox
> fetch then an apply. I download a mailbox then script my own
> application after the fact so it's not so surprising that it happens for
> me, b4 knows nothing about the patches actually being applied until I
> tell it to go look to send thanks.

Not using shazam. This is my abbreviated workflow:

b4.sh am -3 -slt ${PATCHES} -o - ${id} > ${MBOX}
cat ${MBOX} | formail -ds ./scripts/checkpatch.pl || true
cat ${MBOX} | git am -3 --reject
kitty -o font_size=12 git rebase -i HEAD~${NOPATCHES}
b4.sh ty -aS --me-too --since=1.day

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]