From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] mfd: cros_ec: Add multi EC and proto v3 support Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 21:28:12 +0200 Message-ID: <34956392.X7yifgxE7d@phil> References: <1432309340-13688-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1432309340-13688-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Lee Jones , Samuel Ortiz , Olof Johansson , Doug Anderson , Bill Richardson , Simon Glass , Gwendal Grignou , Stephen Barber , Filipe Brandenburger , Todd Broch , Alexandru M Stan , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Hi Javier, Am Freitag, 22. Mai 2015, 17:42:13 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas: > Newer Chromebooks have more than one Embedded Controller (EC) in the > system. These additional ECs are connected through I2C with a host EC > which is the one that is connected to the Application Processor (AP) > through different transports (I2C, SPI or LPC). [...] > The series were tested using a modified ectool [2] that supports the new > cros_ec IOCTL API. They were also tested on a x86 Pixel Chromebook 2 (Samus) > that uses the new protocol v3 and has 2 EC (cros_ec and cros_pd). But for > testing on Samus, also the posted "[PATCH 0/3] platform/chrome: Changes for > cros_ec_lpc and cros_ec_dev" series [3] are needed. > > Gwendal Grignou and Heiko Stuebner tested the first versions of the series > but I did not carry their Tested-by tags for the patches that had not > trivial changes. So testing on more platforms will be highly appreciated. Everything is still working nicely on rk3288-pinky and rk3288-jerry on 4.1-rc4, so still Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner