Linux Samsung SOC development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
To: Michael Tretter <m.tretter@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, jy0922.shim@samsung.com,
	narmstrong@baylibre.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
	sw0312.kim@samsung.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	krzk@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com, Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/16] drm/exynos: add host_ops callback for platform drivers
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:01:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d77a4e9-e5c7-5c8e-5646-1333a3b972a8@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915180239.GB16903@pengutronix.de>


W dniu 15.09.2020 o 20:02, Michael Tretter pisze:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 19:07:59 +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> W dniu 11.09.2020 o 15:54, Michael Tretter pisze:
>>> Platform drivers need to be aware if a mipi dsi device attaches or
>>> detaches. Add host_ops to the driver_data for attach and detach
>>> callbacks and move the i80 mode selection and the hotplug handling into
>>> the callback, because these depend on the drm driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Tretter <m.tretter@pengutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>> - new patch
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>    1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
>>> index 1a15ae71205d..684a2fbef08a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
>>> @@ -239,6 +239,12 @@ struct exynos_dsi_transfer {
>>>    #define DSIM_STATE_CMD_LPM		BIT(2)
>>>    #define DSIM_STATE_VIDOUT_AVAILABLE	BIT(3)
>>>    
>>> +struct exynos_dsi;
>>> +struct exynos_dsi_host_ops {
>>> +	int (*attach)(struct device *dev, struct mipi_dsi_device *device);
>>> +	int (*detach)(struct device *dev, struct mipi_dsi_device *device);
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>    enum exynos_reg_offset {
>>>    	EXYNOS_REG_OFS,
>>>    	EXYNOS5433_REG_OFS
>>> @@ -254,6 +260,7 @@ struct exynos_dsi_driver_data {
>>>    	unsigned int wait_for_reset;
>>>    	unsigned int num_bits_resol;
>>>    	const unsigned int *reg_values;
>>> +	const struct exynos_dsi_host_ops *host_ops;
>>>    };
>>>    
>>>    struct exynos_dsi {
>>> @@ -467,6 +474,41 @@ static const unsigned int exynos5433_reg_values[] = {
>>>    	[PHYTIMING_HS_TRAIL] = 0x0c,
>>>    };
>>>    
>>> +static int __exynos_dsi_host_attach(struct device *dev,
>>> +				    struct mipi_dsi_device *device)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct exynos_dsi *dsi = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> +	struct drm_device *drm = dsi->encoder.dev;
>>
>> As I wrote yesterday drm device was guaranteed to be present here only
>> if mipi dsi host registration was performed in component bind. In case
>> it is performed in probe it will be always NULL, and the code does not
>> make sense.
> Correct, but if the driver is used as a drm bridge, there won't be an encoder
> until bridge_attach. Mipi dsi devices defer their probe until the mipi dsi
> host is available. If I move the mipi dsi host registration into
> bridge_attach, the driver does not know if the next device is another bridge
> or a panel during bridge_attach, but the driver cannot successfully return
> from bridge_attach, because then the drm driver expects a connector.


Hmm, I am not sure why do you think driver expects connector on return 
of briddge_attach.


>
> I guess that the encoder should be initialized before registering the mipi dsi
> host during probe instead of bind.


But you should have already drm dev on encoder init which in probe is 
unavailable.



> The probe won't be rolled back on
> PROBE_DEFER during bind and the encoder will be available in host_attach.
> When splitting the driver into the exynos platform specific code and the more
> generic code, there won't be an encoder during host_attach in the generic
> code, but the host_ops callback could (and will) use the platform specific
> encoder, which is available before bridge_attach.
>
> Does this make sense to you?


Nope :) But maybe I am missing sth.

Generally I see two ways (which I have already described in different 
e-mail, in different words):

A. Static - we wait for every part of display stack to be probed, then 
create drm_dev - typical approach, but slow (deferred probe causes late 
drm creation), and racy - only(?) component framework and DSI bus have 
possibility to signal driver unbind, so we can react on it properly.

B. Dynamic - drm framework requires only crtcs and encoders to be 
attached to drm on init, connectors, and hidden parts (drm_bridges, 
drm_panels) can be created/destroyed and attached/detached at any time 
(almost), so lets take advantage of it - create drm_dev ASAP and attach 
other parts when they become available, the only issue is that there is 
no generic way to be notified when given parts becomes available - in 
interesting area only mipi devices have such notifications via attach 
callbacks.


So either we convert exynos_dsi to A either we continue B approach. In 
second case we should assure mipi_dsi host is created if drm_dev is 
available.


Regards

Andrzej



>
> Michael
>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Andrzej
>>
>>
>>
>>> +	struct exynos_drm_crtc *crtc;
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&drm->mode_config.mutex);
>>> +	crtc = exynos_drm_crtc_get_by_type(drm, EXYNOS_DISPLAY_TYPE_LCD);
>>> +	crtc->i80_mode = !(device->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO);
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&drm->mode_config.mutex);
>>> +
>>> +	if (drm->mode_config.poll_enabled)
>>> +		drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(drm);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __exynos_dsi_host_detach(struct device *dev,
>>> +				     struct mipi_dsi_device *device)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct exynos_dsi *dsi = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> +	struct drm_device *drm = dsi->encoder.dev;
>>> +
>>> +	if (drm->mode_config.poll_enabled)
>>> +		drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(drm);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const struct exynos_dsi_host_ops exynos_dsi_host_ops = {
>>> +	.attach = __exynos_dsi_host_attach,
>>> +	.detach = __exynos_dsi_host_detach,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>    static const struct exynos_dsi_driver_data exynos3_dsi_driver_data = {
>>>    	.reg_ofs = EXYNOS_REG_OFS,
>>>    	.plltmr_reg = 0x50,
>>> @@ -477,6 +519,7 @@ static const struct exynos_dsi_driver_data exynos3_dsi_driver_data = {
>>>    	.wait_for_reset = 1,
>>>    	.num_bits_resol = 11,
>>>    	.reg_values = reg_values,
>>> +	.host_ops = &exynos_dsi_host_ops,
>>>    };
>>>    
>>>    static const struct exynos_dsi_driver_data exynos4_dsi_driver_data = {
>>> @@ -489,6 +532,7 @@ static const struct exynos_dsi_driver_data exynos4_dsi_driver_data = {
>>>    	.wait_for_reset = 1,
>>>    	.num_bits_resol = 11,
>>>    	.reg_values = reg_values,
>>> +	.host_ops = &exynos_dsi_host_ops,
>>>    };
>>>    
>>>    static const struct exynos_dsi_driver_data exynos5_dsi_driver_data = {
>>> @@ -499,6 +543,7 @@ static const struct exynos_dsi_driver_data exynos5_dsi_driver_data = {
>>>    	.wait_for_reset = 1,
>>>    	.num_bits_resol = 11,
>>>    	.reg_values = reg_values,
>>> +	.host_ops = &exynos_dsi_host_ops,
>>>    };
>>>    
>>>    static const struct exynos_dsi_driver_data exynos5433_dsi_driver_data = {
>>> @@ -510,6 +555,7 @@ static const struct exynos_dsi_driver_data exynos5433_dsi_driver_data = {
>>>    	.wait_for_reset = 0,
>>>    	.num_bits_resol = 12,
>>>    	.reg_values = exynos5433_reg_values,
>>> +	.host_ops = &exynos_dsi_host_ops,
>>>    };
>>>    
>>>    static const struct exynos_dsi_driver_data exynos5422_dsi_driver_data = {
>>> @@ -521,6 +567,7 @@ static const struct exynos_dsi_driver_data exynos5422_dsi_driver_data = {
>>>    	.wait_for_reset = 1,
>>>    	.num_bits_resol = 12,
>>>    	.reg_values = exynos5422_reg_values,
>>> +	.host_ops = &exynos_dsi_host_ops,
>>>    };
>>>    
>>>    static const struct of_device_id exynos_dsi_of_match[] = {
>>> @@ -1551,8 +1598,8 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>>>    				  struct mipi_dsi_device *device)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct exynos_dsi *dsi = host_to_dsi(host);
>>> +	const struct exynos_dsi_host_ops *ops = dsi->driver_data->host_ops;
>>>    	struct drm_encoder *encoder = &dsi->encoder;
>>> -	struct drm_device *drm = encoder->dev;
>>>    	struct drm_bridge *out_bridge;
>>>    
>>>    	out_bridge  = of_drm_find_bridge(device->dev.of_node);
>>> @@ -1590,18 +1637,12 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>>>    			return ret;
>>>    	}
>>>    
>>> -	mutex_lock(&drm->mode_config.mutex);
>>> -
>>>    	dsi->lanes = device->lanes;
>>>    	dsi->format = device->format;
>>>    	dsi->mode_flags = device->mode_flags;
>>> -	exynos_drm_crtc_get_by_type(drm, EXYNOS_DISPLAY_TYPE_LCD)->i80_mode =
>>> -			!(dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO);
>>>    
>>> -	mutex_unlock(&drm->mode_config.mutex);
>>> -
>>> -	if (drm->mode_config.poll_enabled)
>>> -		drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(drm);
>>> +	if (ops && ops->attach)
>>> +		ops->attach(dsi->dsi_host.dev, device);
>>>    
>>>    	return 0;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -1610,6 +1651,7 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_detach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>>>    				  struct mipi_dsi_device *device)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct exynos_dsi *dsi = host_to_dsi(host);
>>> +	const struct exynos_dsi_host_ops *ops = dsi->driver_data->host_ops;
>>>    	struct drm_device *drm = dsi->encoder.dev;
>>>    
>>>    	if (dsi->panel) {
>>> @@ -1625,8 +1667,8 @@ static int exynos_dsi_host_detach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>>>    		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dsi->bridge_chain);
>>>    	}
>>>    
>>> -	if (drm->mode_config.poll_enabled)
>>> -		drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(drm);
>>> +	if (ops && ops->detach)
>>> +		ops->detach(dsi->dsi_host.dev, device);
>>>    
>>>    	exynos_dsi_unregister_te_irq(dsi);
>>>    
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=80c78954-dd15920c-80c6021b-0cc47a31c8b4-c39fad41cb70b194&q=1&e=b51d6682-ba72-48c0-b0c9-013866ba39ab&u=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-16 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20200911165401epcas1p3c7ee84dd01db93f472d6fa21c1100f29@epcas1p3.samsung.com>
2020-09-11 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] drm/exynos: Convert driver to drm bridge Michael Tretter
2020-09-11 13:53   ` [PATCH v2 01/16] drm/encoder: remove obsolete documentation of bridge Michael Tretter
2020-11-07 15:07     ` Adam Ford
2020-11-10  8:46       ` Michael Tretter
2020-11-07 22:17     ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-09-11 13:53   ` [PATCH v2 02/16] drm/exynos: remove in_bridge_node from exynos_dsi Michael Tretter
2020-11-07 22:19     ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-09-11 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 03/16] drm/exynos: use exynos_dsi as drvdata Michael Tretter
2020-11-07 22:24     ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-11-09  2:24       ` Inki Dae
2020-09-11 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 04/16] drm/exynos: extract helper functions for probe Michael Tretter
2020-11-07 22:27     ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-11-09  2:52       ` Inki Dae
2020-09-11 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 05/16] drm/exynos: move dsi host registration to probe Michael Tretter
2020-09-11 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 06/16] drm/exynos: shift register values to fields on write Michael Tretter
2020-11-07 22:39     ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-11-10  8:28       ` Michael Tretter
2020-09-11 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 07/16] drm/exynos: use identifier instead of register offsets Michael Tretter
2020-09-11 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 08/16] drm/exynos: add host_ops callback for platform drivers Michael Tretter
2020-09-15 17:07     ` Andrzej Hajda
2020-09-15 18:02       ` Michael Tretter
2020-09-16 22:01         ` Andrzej Hajda [this message]
2020-09-11 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 09/16] drm/exynos: add callback for tearing effect handler Michael Tretter
2020-09-11 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 10/16] drm/exynos: implement a drm bridge Michael Tretter
2020-09-14  8:29     ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-14 12:31       ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-14 20:01         ` Michael Tretter
2020-09-14 21:19           ` Andrzej Hajda
2020-09-15 19:40             ` Andrzej Hajda
2021-02-01 16:33               ` Michael Tretter
2021-02-03 20:31                 ` Michael Tretter
2021-02-04 10:17                   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 10:56                     ` Michael Tretter
2021-02-04 16:05                       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 16:28                         ` Andrzej Hajda
2021-02-04 17:19                           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 17:26                             ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-04 17:46                               ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-10  9:10                                 ` Frieder Schrempf
2021-02-18  8:04                                   ` Michael Tretter
2021-02-18 16:02                                     ` Andrzej Hajda
2021-02-23 12:07                                       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-20 11:42                                         ` Frieder Schrempf
2021-04-20 14:27                                           ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-09-11 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 11/16] drm/exynos: convert encoder functions to bridge function Michael Tretter
2020-09-11 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 12/16] drm/exynos: configure mode on drm bridge Michael Tretter
2020-09-11 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 13/16] drm/exynos: get encoder from bridge whenever possible Michael Tretter
2020-09-11 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 14/16] drm/exynos: add API functions for platform drivers Michael Tretter
2020-09-11 13:54   ` [PATCH v2 15/16] drm/exynos: split out platform specific code Michael Tretter
2020-11-09  3:15   ` [PATCH v2 00/16] drm/exynos: Convert driver to drm bridge Inki Dae
2020-11-10  8:13     ` Michael Tretter
2020-11-10 12:34       ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-11-10 18:52         ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-11-11  3:04       ` Inki Dae
2020-11-11  3:11         ` Inki Dae
2020-11-11 10:18           ` Michael Tretter
2020-11-13  9:34             ` Inki Dae

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4d77a4e9-e5c7-5c8e-5646-1333a3b972a8@samsung.com \
    --to=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.tretter@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox