From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/18] cpufreq: s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:25:59 +0900 Message-ID: <5176A807.2090005@samsung.com> References: <2a5901ce31c9$95160980$bf421c80$%kim@samsung.com> <1769336.FkfMpuXqqb@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1769336.FkfMpuXqqb@vostro.rjw.lan> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: robin.randhawa@arm.com, patches@linaro.org, Viresh Kumar , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks , Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Kukjin Kim , arvind.chauhan@arm.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 04/05/13 20:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on >>> for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this >>> should be sent to upstream via samsung tree. >> >> Hmm... Its already applied in Rafael's tree. But it doesn't mean that >> it can't be >> moved to your tree if there is a issue. > > Well, I'm dropping it. Please merge via the Samsung tree. > Oops, I missed, maybe I have no more chance to send this to upstream for upcoming merge window :-( Rafael, please take this patch with my ack in your tree, sorry for noise. Acked-by: Kukjin Kim If any problems, please kindly let me know. Thanks. - Kukjin